ORIGINAL PAPER
The role of purpose in life and social support in reducing the risk of workaholism among women in Poland
Submission date: 2014-12-18
Final revision date: 2015-02-28
Acceptance date: 2015-02-28
Online publication date: 2015-05-05
Publication date: 2015-05-05
Health Psychology Report 2015;3(4):326–335
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
health attitudes and behaviorincluding prevention and promotionlifespan approaches to health, including those related to older adultsquality of life and well being
ABSTRACT
Background
Workaholism is related to experiencing high negative emotions, the inability to control them, and poor psychological well-being. One of the possible countermeasures against the risk of workaholism can be purpose in life. According to Frankl and Yalom, the feeling that life has a meaning or purpose prevents an individual from experiencing meaninglessness. Purpose in life is considered to be closely associated with mood and well-being and has been proven to act as a countermeasure against depression.
Participants and procedure
The goal of our study was to analyze the relation between workaholism, perception of purpose in life, and social support among women. Two hundred and sixty female professionals took part in the study. They occupied either specialist or managerial positions in their companies, which implies being highly committed to professional roles. Two sociodemographic variables were included in the analysis as significant moderators of the relation studied, namely family status: whether or not women had children, and marital status. We used the following analytical methods: Robinson’s Work Addiction Risk Test (WART, adapted from English by K. Wojdylo), the Purpose-in-Life Test developed by Crumbaugh and Maholick, and Schwarzer’s and Schulz’s Berlin Social Support Scales.
Results
Statistical analysis allowed us to test a model, which proved the existence of a significant relation between “social support” and “purpose in life” variables. The results also indicate a dependency between “purpose in life” and “workaholism” – higher scores in “purpose in life” correspond to lower results in “workaholism”. Additionally, “purpose in life” can be considered a partial mediator between “social support” and “workaholism”.
Conclusions
The direct results prove that social programs aimed at reducing the risk of workaholism by strengthening social support networks can be both effective, e.g. for mothers who work professionally, and ineffective, e.g. for women who do not have children.
Workaholism is related to experiencing high negative emotions, the inability to control them, and poor psychological well-being. One of the possible countermeasures against the risk of workaholism can be purpose in life. According to Frankl and Yalom, the feeling that life has a meaning or purpose prevents an individual from experiencing meaninglessness. Purpose in life is considered to be closely associated with mood and well-being and has been proven to act as a countermeasure against depression.
Participants and procedure
The goal of our study was to analyze the relation between workaholism, perception of purpose in life, and social support among women. Two hundred and sixty female professionals took part in the study. They occupied either specialist or managerial positions in their companies, which implies being highly committed to professional roles. Two sociodemographic variables were included in the analysis as significant moderators of the relation studied, namely family status: whether or not women had children, and marital status. We used the following analytical methods: Robinson’s Work Addiction Risk Test (WART, adapted from English by K. Wojdylo), the Purpose-in-Life Test developed by Crumbaugh and Maholick, and Schwarzer’s and Schulz’s Berlin Social Support Scales.
Results
Statistical analysis allowed us to test a model, which proved the existence of a significant relation between “social support” and “purpose in life” variables. The results also indicate a dependency between “purpose in life” and “workaholism” – higher scores in “purpose in life” correspond to lower results in “workaholism”. Additionally, “purpose in life” can be considered a partial mediator between “social support” and “workaholism”.
Conclusions
The direct results prove that social programs aimed at reducing the risk of workaholism by strengthening social support networks can be both effective, e.g. for mothers who work professionally, and ineffective, e.g. for women who do not have children.
REFERENCES (89)
1.
Andreassen, C. S., Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2007). The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health. Psychology & Health, 22, 615-629.
2.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Burke, R. (2009). Workaholism and relationship quality: a spillover-crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 23-33.
3.
Bal, P. M., & Kooij, D. (2010). The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: the influence of age. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 497-523.
4.
Balducci, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Fraccaroli, F. (2011). The job demands-resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: the role of job-related affect. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 467-496.
5.
Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family. an expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56, 781-796.
6.
Barnett, R. C., Marshall, N. L., & Pleck, J. H. (1992). Men’s multiple roles and their relationship to men’s psychological distress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 358-367.
7.
Baruch, G. K., Biener, L., & Barnett, R. C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress. American Psychologist, 42, 130-136.
8.
Behson, S. J. (2002). Coping with family-to-work conflict: the role of informal work accommodations to family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 324-341.
9.
Berglas, S. (2004). Treating workaholism. In: R. H. Coombs (ed.), Handbook of addictive disorders.
11.
Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L., & Ankenmann, R. D. (2000). The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469-477.
12.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665-692.
13.
Burke, R. J. (1999). Workaholism in organizations: gender fifferences. Sex Roles, 41, 333-345.
14.
Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: the role of personal beliefs and fears. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 13, 53-64.
15.
Burke, R. J., & Koksal, H. (2002). Workaholism among a sample of Turkish managers and professionals: an exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 91, 60-68.
16.
Burke, R. J., & MacDermid, G. (1999). Are workaholics job satisfied and successful in their careers? Career Development International, 4, 277-282.
17.
Burke, R. J., & Matthiesen, S. (2004). Workaholism among Norwegian journalists: antecedents and consequences. Stress and Health, 20, 301-308.
18.
Burke, R. J., Matthiesen, S., & Pallesen, S. (2006). Workaholism, organizational life and well-being of Norwegian nursing staff. Career Development International, 11, 463-477.
19.
Chrzan-Dętkoś, M., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., & Pawlicka, P. (2011). Women, men and second shift – psychological determinants of work-life balance. Polish Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 123-140.
20.
Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: the psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 589-596.
21.
Douglas, E. J., & Morris, R. J. (2006). Workaholic, or just hard worker? Career Development International, 11, 394-417.
22.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
23.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 735-754.
24.
EU (2012). The EU report on the role of men in gender equality. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ge....
25.
Fassel, D. (1991). Wir arbeiten uns noch zu Tode [We work ourselves to death]. München: Kösel.
28.
Guzewicz, M., Steuden, S., & Szymona-Pałkowska, K. (2014). Changes in the perception of self-image and the sense of purpose and meaning in life, among women who lost their child before birth. Health Psychology Report, 2, 162-175.
29.
Harpaz, I., & Snir, R. (2003). Workaholism: its definition and nature. Human Relations, 56, 291-319.
30.
Hedberg, P., Gustafson, Y., Alex, L., & Brulin, C. (2010). Depression in relation to purpose in life among a very old population: a five-year follow-up study. Aging & Mental Health, 14, 757-763.
31.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
32.
Kanai, A., Wakabayashi, M., & Fling, S. (1996). Workaholism among employees in Japanese corporations: an examination based on the Japanese version of the Workaholism Scales. Japanese Psychological Research, 38, 192-203.
33.
Killinger, B. (1991). Workaholics: the respectable addicts. New York: Simon and Schuster.
34.
King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179-196.
35.
Kosakowska, N. (2008). Identity, self-construal and gender role perception. In: A. Chybicka & M. Kaźmierczak (eds.), Appreciating diversity – gender and cultural issues (pp. 31-54). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
36.
Kosakowska, N., Chybicka, A., & Kaźmierczak, M. (2006). Women’s dual shift – women’s quality of life in dual-career marriages. Science Meets Reality, Central European Center for Women and Youth in Science. Conference proceedings online. http://www.cecwys.org/prilohy/....
37.
Kosakowska, N., & Petrus, P. (2006). Kobieta na dwóch etatach – funkcjonowanie kobiet w małżeństwach dwu karier [Woman and her second shift – functioning of women in dual – careers couples]. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 11, 163-174.
38.
Lipińska-Grobelny, A. (2014). Psychological determinants of portfolio workers’ satisfaction with life. Health Psychology Report, 2, 280-290.
39.
Lu, L. (2000). Gender and conjugal differences in happiness. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 132-141.
40.
Łuszczyńska, A., Kowalska, M., Mazurkiewicz, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). Berlińskie Skale Wsparcia Społecznego (BSSS): wyniki wstępnych badań nad adaptacją skal i ich własnościami psychometrycznymi [Berliner Social Support Scales (BSSS): preliminary results of research on the adaptation of scales and their psychometric properties]. Studia Psychologiczne, 44, 17-27.
41.
Marks, S. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: some notes on human energy, time, and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.
42.
McGonagle, A. K., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., Di Milia, L., Fischer, F. M., Hobbs, B., Kaliterna, L., Iskra-Golec, I., & Smith, L. (2013). Demands, resources, and work ability: A cross-national examination of health care workers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 1-17.
43.
McMillan, L. H. W., Brady, E. C., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Marsh, N. V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins’ (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 357-368.
44.
Minirth, F., Meier, P., Wichern, F., Brewer, B., & Skipper, S. (1981). The workaholic and his family: an inside look. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
45.
Naughton, T. J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counseling and research. The Career Development Quarterly, 35, 180-187.
46.
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: a conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 111-136.
48.
Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work–family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299-312.
49.
Peplińska, A., Lipowski, M., & Nieckarz, Z. (2011). Career and professional development – challenges for employees and modern organizations. Polish Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 75-100.
50.
Peplińska, A., & Rostowska, T. (2013). Quality of life and relations between work and family. Acta Neuropsychologica, 11, 77-92.
51.
Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). Reactions to ethnic deviance: the role of backlash in racial stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 265-281.
52.
Pietropinto, A. (1986). The workaholic spouse. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 20, 89-96.
53.
Pietromonaco, P., Manis, J. D., & Frohardt-Lane, K. (1984). Psychological Consequences of Multiple Social Roles. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Center for Continuing Education of Women.
54.
Popielski, K. (1987). Testy egzystencjalne: metody badania frustracji egzystencjalnej i nerwicy neogennej [Existential tests: methods of measuring existential frustration and neogenic anxiety]. In: K. Popielski (ed.), Człowiek – pytanie otwarte [Man - the open question] (pp. 237-262). Lublin: RW KUL.
55.
Poppelreuter, S. (1997). Arbeitssucht [Workaholism]. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
56.
Porter, G. (1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of Occupational and Health Psychology, 1, 70-84.
57.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
58.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: the contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
59.
Robinson, B. E. (1989). Work addiction. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications.
60.
Robinson, B. E. (1998). Chained to the desk : a guidebook for workaholics, their partners and children, and the clinicians who treat them. New York: New York University Press.
61.
Robinson, B. E., & Phillips, B. (1995). Measuring workaholism: content validity of the Work Addiction Risk Test. Psychological Reports, 77, 657-658.
62.
Robinson, B. E., & Post, P. (1995). Work addiction as a function of family of origin and its influence on current family functioning. The Family Journal, 3, 200-206.
63.
Robinson, B. E., & Post, P. (1997). Risk of addiction to work and family functioning. Psychological Reports, 81, 91-95.
64.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
65.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.
66.
Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165-179.
67.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41, 192-202.
68.
Russo, J. A., & Waters, L. E. (2006). Workaholic worker type differences in work-family conflict: the moderating role of supervisor support and flexible work scheduling. Career Development International, 11, 418-439.
69.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Work engagement: on how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 39-46.
70.
Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., & Taris, T. W. (2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in the Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 320-348.
71.
Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology, 57, 173-203.
72.
Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Soziale Unterstützung bei der Krankhaitsbewältigung: Die Berliner Social Support Skalen (BSSS) [Social support in coping with illness: The Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS)]. Diagnostica, 49, 73-82.
73.
Schwartz, H. S. (1982). Job involvement as obsession-compulsion. Academy of Management Review, 7, 429-432.
74.
Shimazu, A., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2009). How job demands affect an intimate partner: a test of the spillover-crossover model in Japan. Journal of Occupational Health, 51, 239-248.
75.
Shimazu, A., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Shimada, K., & Kawakami, N. (2011). Workaholism and well-being among Japanese dual-earner couples: a spillover-crossover perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 73, 399-409.
76.
Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160-178.
78.
Thoits, P. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 48, 174-178.
79.
van Wijhe, C., Peeters, M., Schaufeli, W., & Ouweneel, E. (2012). Rise and shine: recovery experiences of workaholic and nonworkaholic employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 476-489.
80.
Wojdylo, K. (2005a). Kwestionariusz Pracoholizmu (WART) – adaptacja narzędzia i wstępna analiza własności psychometrycznych [The Questionnaire of Workaholism (WART) – adaptation and preliminary analysis of psychometric properties]. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 4, 71-84.
81.
Wojdylo, K. (2005b). Pracoholizm. Niektóre wyznaczniki uporczywości działania [Workaholism. Some determinants of work obstinacy] (Doctoral thesis). Warszawa: Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej.
82.
Wojdylo, K. (2007). Koncepcja osobowościowych wyznaczników pracoholizmu: weryfikacja założeń w korelacyjnym modelu [A conception of personal determinants of workaholism: verification of assumptions in the correlation model]. Studia Psychologiczne, 45, 53-65.
83.
Wojdylo, K. (2010a). Funkcjonowanie pracoholików w sytuacji zadaniowej [Functioning of workaholics in the task situation]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 53, 75-98.
84.
Wojdylo, K. (2010b). Pracoholizm. Perspektywa poznawcza [Workaholism. A cognitive perspective]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Difin.
85.
Wojdylo, K. (2013). Work craving – teoria uzależnienia od pracy [Work craving – the theory of work addiction]. Nauka, 3, 87-97.
86.
Wojdylo, K., Baumann, N., Buczny, J., Owens, G., & Kuhl, J. (2013). Work Craving: A Conceptualization and Its Measurement. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 547-568.
87.
Wojdylo, K., Baumann, N., Fischbach L., & Engeser, S. (2014). Live to Work or Love to Work: Work Craving, and Work Engagement. PLoS One, 9, 1-7.
88.
Wojdylo, K., & Lewandowska-Walter, A. (2010). Pracoholizm a płeć i style przywiązaniowe [Workaholism, sex and attachment styles]. In: A. Chybicka & N. Kosakowska-Berezecka (eds.), W obiektywie płci. Naukowe i praktyczne inspiracje [In the lens of gender. Theories and applications] (pp. 133-149). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.