ORIGINAL PAPER
Self, partner, and relationship motivations for healthy and unhealthy behaviors
1
Hanover College, USA
2
Texas State University, USA
Submission date: 2016-09-06
Final revision date: 2016-11-21
Acceptance date: 2016-11-22
Online publication date: 2017-02-01
Publication date: 2017-01-26
Health Psychology Report 2017;5(3):219-226
KEYWORDS
well-beingMotivationthe quality of the relationshiphealth influencemotivationquality of the relationship
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background
This study merges two theoretical paradigms: self-determination theory and interdependence theory. The primary objective was to examine whether people in relationships are motivated to enact healthy or unhealthy behaviors based on personal (i.e., autonomous) or interpersonal (controlled) motives.
Participants and procedure
We tested the sources of healthy and unhealthy motivation in a cross-sectional, dyadic survey, collecting data from 243 couples in romantic relationships. Survey items assessed sources of healthy and unhealthy motivational influence, including the self, partner, and relationship, in conjunction with relationship satisfaction and well-being. Data were analyzed according to the Actor Partner Interdependence Model to examine intrapersonal and interpersonal associations between variables.
Results
Healthy and unhealthy behavior motivation appears to be a relational, rather than individual construct. Partner healthy motivation was positively associated with individuals’ relationship satisfaction. For individuals who reported more unhealthy relationship motivations, relationship satisfaction and well-being were lower. There were no significant associations for self motivations.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that relational partners and the romantic relationship itself are important in understanding the dimensions of health motivation for people in relationships. We conclude that the romantic relationship context impacts health maintenance, supporting the merging of personal and interpersonal motivations for health behaviors.
This study merges two theoretical paradigms: self-determination theory and interdependence theory. The primary objective was to examine whether people in relationships are motivated to enact healthy or unhealthy behaviors based on personal (i.e., autonomous) or interpersonal (controlled) motives.
Participants and procedure
We tested the sources of healthy and unhealthy motivation in a cross-sectional, dyadic survey, collecting data from 243 couples in romantic relationships. Survey items assessed sources of healthy and unhealthy motivational influence, including the self, partner, and relationship, in conjunction with relationship satisfaction and well-being. Data were analyzed according to the Actor Partner Interdependence Model to examine intrapersonal and interpersonal associations between variables.
Results
Healthy and unhealthy behavior motivation appears to be a relational, rather than individual construct. Partner healthy motivation was positively associated with individuals’ relationship satisfaction. For individuals who reported more unhealthy relationship motivations, relationship satisfaction and well-being were lower. There were no significant associations for self motivations.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that relational partners and the romantic relationship itself are important in understanding the dimensions of health motivation for people in relationships. We conclude that the romantic relationship context impacts health maintenance, supporting the merging of personal and interpersonal motivations for health behaviors.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Bove, C. F., Sobal, J., & Rauschenbach, B. S. (2003). Food choices among newly married couples: Convergence, conflict, individualism, and projects. Appetite, 40, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6663(02)00147-2.
2.
Boyd, M. P., Weinmann, C., & Yin, Z. (2002). The relationship of physical self-perceptions and goal orientations to intrinsic motivation for exercise. Journal of Sport Behavior, 25, 1–18.
3.
Briñol, P., McCaslin, M. J., & Petty, R. E. (2012). Self-generated persuasion: Effects of the target and direction of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 925–940. doi: 10.1037/a0027231.
4.
Burke, V., Beilin, L. J., Dunbar, D., & Kevan, M. (2004). Changes in health-related behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: Associations with living with a partner. Preventive Medicine, 39, 722–730.
5.
Burke, T. J., & Segrin, C. (2016). Weight-related social control and relationship quality: Accuracy and bias effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 999–1017. doi: 10.1177/0265407515615692.
6.
Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. doi: 10.1080/03637759209376268.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015, August 10). Heart disease facts. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm.
8.
Craig, P. L., & Truswell, A. S. (1990). Dynamics of food habits of newly married couples: Weight and exercise patterns. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 47, 42–46.
9.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
10.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan. R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 493, 182–185.
11.
Dunsmore, S., & Goodson, P. (2006). Motivation for healthy behavior: A review of health promotion research. American Journal of Health Education, 37, 170–183.
12.
Hong, T. B., Franks, M. M., Gonzalez, R., Keteyian, S. J., Franklin, B. A., & Artinian, N. T. (2005). A dyadic investigation of exercise support between cardiac patients and their spouses. Health Psychology, 24, 430–434.
13.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
14.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
15.
Lewis, M. A., & Butterfield, R. M. (2007). Social control in marital relationships: Effect of one’s partner on health behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 298–319.
16.
Markey, C. N., Markey, P. M., & Gray, H. F. (2007). Romantic relationships and health: An examination of individuals’ perceptions of their partner’s influences on their health. Sex Roles, 57, 435–445.
17.
Mata, J., Silva, M. N., Vieira, P. N., Carraca, E. V., Andrade, A. M., Coutinho, S. R., Sardinha, L. B., & Teixeira, P. J. (2009). Motivational “spill-over” during weight control: Increased self-determination and exercise intrinsic motivation predict eating self-regulation. Health Psychology, 28, 709–716.
18.
Moreno, J. A., Gonzalez-Cutre, D., Martin-Albo, J., & Cervello, E. (2010). Motivation and performance in physical education: An experimental test. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9, 79–85.
19.
Powell, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2003). Genuine giving or selfish sacrifice? The role of commitment and cost level upon willingness to sacrifice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 403–412.
20.
Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
22.
Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). Examining intrinsic versus extrinsic exercise goals: Cognitive, affective and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31, 189–210.
23.
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
24.
Treiber, F. A., Baranowski, T., Braden, D. S., Strong, W. B., Levy, M., & Knox, W. (1991). Social support for exercise: Relationship to physical activity in young adults. Preventive Medicine, 20, 737–750.
25.
Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
26.
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-5571 |
| ISSN: | 2353-4184 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
