ORIGINAL PAPER
Coping with the events of daily life and quality of life of the socially active elderly
Submission date: 2014-05-05
Acceptance date: 2014-05-06
Online publication date: 2014-07-02
Publication date: 2014-07-02
Health Psychology Report 2014;2(2):123-131
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
lifespan approaches to health, including those related to older adultsquality of life and well beingresearch methodology, measurement, and statistics in health psychology
ABSTRACT
Background
Late adulthood is a period in which the number of stressors is increasing; therefore, strategies of coping with these situations may be significant in terms of the subjective evaluation of the quality of life and adaptation to old age. The objective of this paper was to examine the relationships between proactive coping and the quality of life in people in late adulthood. The quality of life was assessed using the Polish version of the CASP-19.
Participants and procedure
The research included 88 individuals (76 women and 12 men), aged from 60 to 85 years (M = 69.5, SD = 6.74). The following tools were used: The Proactive Coping Inventory, developed by Greenglass, Schwarzer and Taubert (Pasikowski’s adaptation), and the scale for the assessment of the quality of life, called CASP-19, of Higgs, Hyde, Wiggins and Blane (developed by the authors of this paper).
Results
The results of the research showed a positive relationship between the general level of proactive coping strategies, the proactive coping subscale and the general quality of life and addressing the needs of control and pleasure. People who are more proactive accomplish a higher general level of the quality of life, control and pleasure than people whose pro-activity level is lower.
Conclusions
Factors contributing to the quality of life and successful aging of elderly subjects are, first and foremost, skills connected with setting objectives autonomously, taking initiative, perseverance in activities and perceiving events in terms of opportunities of development and self-improvement. The CASP-19 seems to be a useful measure of the quality of life in old age.
Late adulthood is a period in which the number of stressors is increasing; therefore, strategies of coping with these situations may be significant in terms of the subjective evaluation of the quality of life and adaptation to old age. The objective of this paper was to examine the relationships between proactive coping and the quality of life in people in late adulthood. The quality of life was assessed using the Polish version of the CASP-19.
Participants and procedure
The research included 88 individuals (76 women and 12 men), aged from 60 to 85 years (M = 69.5, SD = 6.74). The following tools were used: The Proactive Coping Inventory, developed by Greenglass, Schwarzer and Taubert (Pasikowski’s adaptation), and the scale for the assessment of the quality of life, called CASP-19, of Higgs, Hyde, Wiggins and Blane (developed by the authors of this paper).
Results
The results of the research showed a positive relationship between the general level of proactive coping strategies, the proactive coping subscale and the general quality of life and addressing the needs of control and pleasure. People who are more proactive accomplish a higher general level of the quality of life, control and pleasure than people whose pro-activity level is lower.
Conclusions
Factors contributing to the quality of life and successful aging of elderly subjects are, first and foremost, skills connected with setting objectives autonomously, taking initiative, perseverance in activities and perceiving events in terms of opportunities of development and self-improvement. The CASP-19 seems to be a useful measure of the quality of life in old age.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: P. B. Baltes, & M. M. Baltes (eds.). Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bjørkløf, G. H., Engedal, K., Selbćk, G., Kouwenhoven, S. E., & Helvik, A.-S. (2012). Coping and depression in old age: a literature review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 35, 121-154.
3.
Braun-Gałkowska, M. (2006). Nowe role społeczne ludzi starszych [The new social roles of old people]. In: S. Steuden, & M. Marczuk (eds.). Starzenie się a satysfakcja z życia [Aging and Life Satisfaction] (pp. 183-195). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
4.
Brzezińska, M., & Steuden, S. (2011). Proaktywne radzenie sobie a satysfakcja z życia w okresie późnej dorosłości [Proactive coping and life satisfaction in late adulthood]. In: S. Steuden, M. Stanowska, & K. Janowski (eds.). Starzenie się z godnością [Ageing with the Dignity] (pp. 131-150). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
5.
Diehl, M., Chui, H., Hay, E. L., Lumley, M. A., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Change in coping and defense mechanisms across adulthood: longitudinal findings in a European American Sample. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0033619.
7.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping. Task, emotion and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60.
8.
Greenglass, E. (2002). Chapter 3. Proactive coping. In: E. Frydenberg (ed.). Beyond coping: meeting goals, vision, and challenges (pp. 37-62). London: Oxford University Press.
9.
Greenglass, E. R., & Fiksenbaum, L. (2009). Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being: testing for mediation using path analysis considerations. In: J. P. Ziegelmann, & S. Lippke (eds.). Invited paper in European Psychologist. Special section on theory-based approaches of stress and coping, 14, 29-39.
10.
Greenglass, E., Schwarzer, R., Jakubiec, S. D., Fiksenbaum L., & Taubert, S. (1999). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI): a multidimensional research instrument. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the STAR (Stress and Anxiety Research Society) Cracow, Poland, July 12-14.
11.
GUS (2013). Mały Rocznik Statystyczny Polski 2013. Warszawa: Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych; published on the website: http://www.stat.gov.pl/cps/rde... (of 28.02.2014).
12.
Halicka, M. (2004). Satysfakcja życiowa ludzi starych [Life Satisfaction of the Elderly]. Białystok: Akademia Medyczna.
13.
Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R., & Blane, D. (2003). Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension, social policy and administration. Social Policy & Administration 37, 239-252.
14.
Hobfoll, S. H. (1989). Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.
15.
Janiszewska-Rain, J. (2005). Okres późnej dorosłości. Jak rozpoznać potencjał ludzi w wieku podeszłym? [Late adulthood stage. How to recognise the potential of elderly people?]. In: A. Brzezińska (ed.). Psychologiczne portrety człowieka [Psychological Portraits of Man] (pp. 591-622). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
16.
Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). „Prawdziwych przyjaciół…” Wsparcie społeczne, stres, choroba i śmierć [“Real friends…”. Social support, stress, illness and heath]. In: H. Sęk, & R. Cieślak (eds.). Wsparcie społeczne, stres i zdrowie [Social Support, Stress and Health] (pp. 29-48). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
17.
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
18.
Lazarus, R. (1986). Paradygmat stresu i radzenia sobie [The Paradigm of Stress and Coping]. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 3-4, 2-39.
19.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
20.
Meléndez, J. C., Mayordomo, T., Sancho, P., & Tomás, J. M. (2012). Coping strategies: gender differences and development throughout life span. The Spanish Journal Of Psychology, 15, 1089-1098.
21.
Oleś, M. (2010). Jakość życia młodzieży w zdrowiu i w chorobie [Quality of Life in Adolescence – in Health and Disease]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
22.
Ouwehand, C., De Ridder, D. T. D., & Bensing, J. M. (2007). A review of successful aging models: proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 873-884.
23.
Pasikowski, T., Sęk, H., Greenglass, E., & Taubert, S. (2002). The proactive coping inventory – Polish adaptation. Polish Psychological Buletin, 33, 41-46.
24.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2004). Paradoksy kondycji ludzkiej: dobrostan i zdrowie na drodze ku śmierci [Ironies of the human condition: well-being and health on the way to morality]. In: J. Czapiński (ed.). Psychologia pozytywna. Nauka o szczęściu, zdrowiu, sile i cnotach człowieka [Positive Psychology. The Science of Human Happiness, Health, Strength and Virtues] (pp. 147-162). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
25.
Schwarzer, R., & Taubert, S. (1999). Radzenie sobie ze stresem: wymiary i procesy [Coping with stress: Dimensions and processes]. Promocja Zdrowia, Nauki Społeczne i Medycyna, 17, 72-92.
26.
Sęk, H., & Cieślak R. (2006). Wsparcie społeczne – sposoby definiowania, rodzaje i źródła wsparcia, wybrane koncepcje teoretyczne [Social support – how to define, the types and sources of support, selected theoretical concepts]. In: H. Sęk, & R. Cieślak (eds.). Wsparcie społeczne, stres i zdrowie [Social Support, Stress and Health] (pp. 11-28). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
27.
Sęk, H., & Pasikowski, T. (2003). Proaktywne strategie radzenia sobie ze stresem życiowym a subiektywne wskaźniki zdrowia [Proactive Coping and Subjective Health Indicators]. Studia Psychologiczne, 41, 105-126.
28.
Simons, C. M. (2002). Proactive coping, perceived self-efficacy, and locus of control as predictors of life satisfaction in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63 (3-B), 1590.
29.
Słysz, A. (2004). Refleksyjność, proaktywne radzenie sobie ze stresem życiowym a zdrowie [Reflexivity, proactive coping and health]. In: Ł. Kaczmarek, & H. Sęk (eds.). W stronę psychologii pozytywnej [Toward a Positive Psychology] (pp. 31-48). Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
30.
Steuden, S., & Gamrowska, A. (2012). Polskie opracowanie skali do badania jakości życia osób starszych CASP-19, autorstwa P. Higgsa, M. Hyde, R. Wigginsa, D. Blane [Polish development Older People’s Quality of Life Questionnaire CASP-19, by P. Higgs, M. Hyde, R. Wiggins, D. Blane]. Lublin. Katedra Psychologii Klinicznej. Wersja eksperymentalna. Do użytku wewnętrznego.
31.
Steuden, S. (2009). Szczęśliwi po pięćdziesiątce [Happy in Their Fifties]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie i Profesjonalne Sp. z o.o.
32.
Steuden, S. (2011). Psychologia starzenia się i starości [Psychology of Ageing and Old Age]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
33.
Steuden, S., & Marczuk, M. (2006). Wstęp [The Introduction]. In: S. Steuden, & M. Marczuk (eds.). Starzenie się a satysfakcja z życia [Aging and Life Satisfaction] (pp. 9-14). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
34.
Straś-Romanowska, M. (2002). Późna dorosłość. Wiek starzenia się [Late adulthood. The period of ageing]. In: B. Harwas-Napierała, & J. Trempała (eds.). Psychologia rozwoju człowieka [Psychology of Human Development] (Vol. 2, pp. 263-293). Warszawa: PWN.
35.
Straś-Romanowska, M. (2005). Jakość życia w świetle założeń psychologii zorientowanej na osobę [Quality of life in the light of person-oriented psychology]. Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 13, 263-274.
36.
Szatur-Jaworska, B., Błędowski, P., & Dzięgielewska, M. (2006). Podstawy gerontologii społecznej [Principles of Social Gerontology]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.
37.
Trouillet, R., Doan-Van-Hay, L. M., Launay, M., & Martin, S. (2011). Impact of age, and cognitive and coping resources on coping. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 541-550.
38.
Uskul, A. K., & Greenglass, E. (2005). Psychological well-being in a Turkish-Canadian sample. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 18, 169-178.
39.
Wrześniewski, K. (2000). Style a strategie radzenia sobie ze stresem. Problemy pomiaru [Styles and strategies of coping with stress. measurement issues]. In: I. Heszen-Niejodek, & Z. Ratajczak (eds.). Człowiek w sytuacji stresu [Human Being in the Situation of Stress] (pp. 44-64). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-5571 |
| ISSN: | 2353-4184 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
