ORIGINAL PAPER
Psychometric characteristics and measurement invariance across genders of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) among Nigerian adolescents
Submission date: 2018-08-08
Final revision date: 2018-12-25
Acceptance date: 2018-12-27
Online publication date: 2019-01-30
Publication date: 2019-01-30
Health Psychology Report 2019;7(1):69-80
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in terms of its factor structure, reliability, va-lidity and measurement invariance across genders has not been examined among Nigerian adolescents.
Participants and procedure:
We evaluated the psychometric properties and gender invariance of the MSPSS among Nigerian senior high school adolescents (N = 1335, Mage = 15.15). Other study measures completed were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory (PANSI), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). The four models of the MSPSS described in the literature were com-pared with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The model with the best fit indices was examined for its internal consistency by calculating the MacDonald’s omega (ω) while criterion validity was examined through correla-tional analyses with other study measures. Measurement invariance in relation to gender was assessed with multi-group nested CFA.
Results:
Our results confirmed the original 3-factor structure of the MSPSS (Family, Significant others, and Friends). CFA showed that our data equivalently fitted the first (original first order 3-factor) and the fourth (second order 3-factor) MSPSS models. The reliability and criterion validity were satisfactory. Configural, metric and scalar measurement invariances in relation to genders were confirmed.
Conclusions:
The 3-factor MSPSS either in its original (first-order) or second-order model is useful as a perceived social support assessment instrument among Nigerian adolescents.
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in terms of its factor structure, reliability, va-lidity and measurement invariance across genders has not been examined among Nigerian adolescents.
Participants and procedure:
We evaluated the psychometric properties and gender invariance of the MSPSS among Nigerian senior high school adolescents (N = 1335, Mage = 15.15). Other study measures completed were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation Inventory (PANSI), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). The four models of the MSPSS described in the literature were com-pared with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The model with the best fit indices was examined for its internal consistency by calculating the MacDonald’s omega (ω) while criterion validity was examined through correla-tional analyses with other study measures. Measurement invariance in relation to gender was assessed with multi-group nested CFA.
Results:
Our results confirmed the original 3-factor structure of the MSPSS (Family, Significant others, and Friends). CFA showed that our data equivalently fitted the first (original first order 3-factor) and the fourth (second order 3-factor) MSPSS models. The reliability and criterion validity were satisfactory. Configural, metric and scalar measurement invariances in relation to genders were confirmed.
Conclusions:
The 3-factor MSPSS either in its original (first-order) or second-order model is useful as a perceived social support assessment instrument among Nigerian adolescents.
REFERENCES (54)
1.
Abiodun, O. A. (1994). A validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in general hos-pital units and a community sample in Nigeria. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 669–672.
2.
Akintayo, R. O., Odunlami, G. J., Bamidele, O. F., Fabiyi, E. P., Akintayo, F. C., Bamidele, O. V., Dedeke, I. A., Osagie, T. T., & Ibisola, A. A. (2018). The impacts of state and trait anxiety as mod-erated by perceived social support among Nigerian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatolo-gia, 56, 155–163.
3.
Aloba, O., Adefemi, S., & Aloba, T. (2018). Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) Inventory: Initial Psychometric Properties as a Suicide Risk Screening Tool Among Nigerian University Stu-dents. Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry, 9, 1–9.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
5.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covar-iance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
6.
Brown, T. T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846.
8.
Bruwer, B., Emsley, R., Kidd, M., Lochner, C., & Seedat, S. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in youth. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49, 195–201.
9.
Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300.
10.
Byrne, B. M. (2013a). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic con-cepts, applications, and programming. London: Psychology Press.
11.
Byrne, B. M. (2013b). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and pro-gramming. London: Routledge.
12.
Canty-Mitchell, J., & Zimet, G. D. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in urban adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 391–400.
13.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struc-tural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
14.
Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. (2004). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: dimen-sionality and age and gender differences in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1359–1369.
15.
Cheng, Y., Li, X., Lou, C., Sonenstein, F. L., Kalamar, A., Jejeebhoy, S., Delany-Moretlwe, S., Brahmbhatt, H., Olumide, A. O., & Ojengbede, O. (2014). The Association Between Social Support and Mental Health Among Vulnerable Adolescents in Five Cities: Findings From the Study of the Well-Being of Adolescents in Vulnerable Environments. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, S31–S38.
16.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measure-ment invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
17.
Chou, K. L. (2000). Assessing Chinese adolescents’ social support: the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 299–307.
18.
Clara, I. P., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., Murray, L. T., & Torgrudc, L. J. (2003). Confirmatory factor anal-ysis of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in clinically distressed and student samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 265–270.
19.
Crutzen, R., & Peters, G. Y. (2017). Scale quality: alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psychology Review, 11, 242–247.
20.
Dębska, G., Pasek, M., & Wojtyna, E. (2017). Does anybody support the supporters? Social support in the cancer patient-caregiver dyad. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review, 19, 110–113.
21.
Decker, D. M., Dona, D. P., & Christenson, S. L. (2007). Behaviorally at-risk African American stu-dents: The importance of student-teacher relationships for student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 83–109.
22.
Fredrick, S. S., Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., & Dorio, N. B. (2018). Can social support buffer the association between depression and suicidal ideation in adolescent boys and girls? Psychology in the Schools, 55, 490–505.
23.
Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2011). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. London: Routledge.
24.
Guan, N. C., Seng, L. H., Hway Ann, A. Y., & Hui, K. O. (2015). Factorial validity and reliability of the Malaysian simplified Chinese version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS-SCV) among a group of university students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27, 225–231.
25.
Guan, N. C., Sulaiman, A. R., Seng, L. H., Ann, A. Y., Wahab, S., & Pillai, S. K. (2013). Factorial valid-ity and reliability of the Tamil version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support among a group of participants in university Malaya medical center, Malaysia. Indian Journal of Psy-chological Medicine, 35, 385–388.
26.
Hamza, A., Mohsein, N. A., & Yim, L. (2012). Measuring perceived social support in stroke survivors: linguistic validation of the multidimensional scale of Perceived social support (MSPSS) in Hausa (Nigerian) language. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 26–29.
27.
Hricová, M. (2018). Coping strategies and social environment of patients with sudden hearing loss. Health Psychology Report, 6, 216–221.
28.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underpa-rameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
29.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conven-tional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
30.
Jacob, K., Everitt, B., Patel, V., Weich, S., Araya, R., & Lewis, G. (1998). The comparison of latent variable models of non-psychotic psychiatric morbidity in four culturally diverse populations. Psy-chological Medicine, 28, 145–152.
31.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 294–294.
32.
Khatib, Y., Bhui, K., & Stansfeld, S. A. (2013). Does social support protect against depression & psychological distress? Findings from the RELACHS study of East London adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 393–402.
33.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guil-ford.
34.
Klineberg, E., Clark, C., Bhui, K. S., Haines, M. M., Viner, R. M., Head, J., Woodley-Jones, D., & Stansfeld, S. A. (2006). Social support, ethnicity and mental health in adolescents. Social Psy-chiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41, 755–760.
35.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
36.
Marshall, S. L., Parker, P. D., Ciarrochi, J., & Heaven, P. C. L. (2014). Is self-esteem a cause or con-sequence of social support? A 4-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 85, 1275–1291.
37.
Miller, A. B., Esposito-Smythers, C., & Leichtweis, R. N. (2015). Role of social support in adolescent suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 286–292.
38.
Mohammad, A. H., Al Sadat, N., Loh, S. Y., & Chinna, K. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Hausa version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support index. Iranian Red Crescent Med-ical Journal, 17, 1–7.
39.
Ng, C. G., Amer Siddiq, A. N., Aida, S. A., Zainal, N. Z., & Koh, O. H. (2010). Validation of the Malay version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS-M) among a group of medical students in the Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 3–6.
40.
Osman, A., Gutierrez, P. M., Kopper, B. A., Barrios, F. X., & Chiros, C. E. (1998). The positive and negative suicide ideation inventory: development and validation. Psychological Report, 82, 783–793.
41.
Osman, A., Lamis, D. A., Freedenthal, S., Gutierrez, P. M., & McNaughton-Cassill, M. (2014). The mul-tidimensional scale of perceived social support: analyses of internal reliability, measurement invari-ance, and correlates across gender. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 103–112.
42.
Oyefeso, A. O., & Zacheaus, A. (1990). Self‐esteem as Determined by Gender Differences among Yoruba Adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria: A Research Note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychia-try, 31, 461–463.
43.
Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Li, C.-H. (2012). Measurement invariance for latent constructs in multiple populations: A critical view and refocus. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 954–974.
44.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-iMage (Vol. 11). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Stanley, M. A., Beck, J. G., & Zebb, B. J. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MSPSS in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 2, 186–193.
46.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
47.
Thompson, E. A., Eggert, L. L., & Herting, J. R. (2000). Mediating effects of an indicated prevention program for reducing youth depression and suicide risk behaviors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 30, 252–271.
48.
Vaingankar, J. A., Abdin, E., & Chong, S. A. (2012). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in patients with schizophrenia. Comprehen-sive Psychiatry, 53, 286–291.
49.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance liter-ature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.
50.
Van Lieshout, R. J., Cleverley, K., Jenkins, J. M., & Georgiades, K. (2011). Assessing the measure-ment invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale across immigrant and non-immigrant women in the postpartum period. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 14, 413–423.
51.
Vilchinsky, N., Dekel, R., Leibowitz, M., Reges, O., Khaskia, A., & Mosseri, M. (2011). Dynamics of support perceptions among couples coping with cardiac illness: the effect on recovery outcomes. Health Psychology, 30, 411–419.
52.
Zarzycka, D., Ślusarska, B., Dyk, D., Bednarek, A., & Trojanowska, A. (2018). Polish adaptation of Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, a Version For Students (ISEL-48v.Coll: Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, College Version). Health Problems of Civilization, 11, 280–286.
53.
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.
54.
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of per-ceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2353-5571 |
| ISSN: | 2353-4184 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
