ORIGINAL PAPER
Polish adaptation and validation of the Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale
 
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-01-04
Final revision date: 2017-03-13
Acceptance date: 2017-04-29
Online publication date: 2017-12-06
Publication date: 2017-12-07
 
Health Psychology Report 2018;6(2):183–191
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Dieting self-efficacy is defined as individual’s belief in his or her ability to adhere to a diet in order to lose or maintain current weight. Self-efficacious individuals can overcome challenges and obstacles while dieting. The main objective of this study is to report the psychometric properties of the first Polish adaptation of the Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale (DIET-SE) of Christine Stich, Barbel Knauper, and Ami Tint. The original Canadian DIET SE is a scenario-based scale assessing dieting self-efficacy for weight loss and maintenance. It consists of three subscales and assesses dieting self-efficacy for three different types of temptation situations.

Participants and procedure:
There were 552 students (age M = 20.32, SD = 2.98) participating in the study. The original Canadian Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale was translated into Polish, and its factor structure, reliability and construct validity were determined.

Results:
The study showed that the Polish version of the Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale is a reliable and valid scale. The obtained results support the same three-factor structure that was previously documented in the original version of the scale.

Conclusions:
The Polish version of the DIET-SE can be used to identify personal factors that obstruct weight reduction or weight maintenance.

 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Armitage, C., Parfitt, G., Pegington, M., Donnelly, L., & Harvie, M. N. (2014). Self-efficacy for temptations is a better predictor of weight loss than motivation and global self-efficacy: Evidence from two prospective studies among overweight/obese women at high risk of breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 95, 254–258. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.015.
 
2.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York & London: The Guilford Press.
 
3.
Choo, J., & Kang, H. (2015). Predictors of initial weight loss among women with abdominal obesity: a path model using self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviour. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 7, 1087–1097. doi: 10.1111/jan.12604.
 
4.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
 
5.
Glebocka, A., & Kulbat J. (2005). Ideal body images of female body shape in normal and pathological groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 88–98.
 
6.
Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and essentially tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Psychological Assessment, 66, 930–944. doi: 10.1177/0013164406288165.
 
7.
Heijden, M., Pouwer, F., & Pop, V. (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale in Dutch Primary Care Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 394–401. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9308-z.
 
8.
Heitmann, B. L., Westerterp, K. R., Loos, R. J. F., Sorensen, T. I. A., O’Dea, K., McLean, P., …Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S. (2012). Obesity: lessons from evolution and the environment. Obesity Reviews, 13, 910–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01007.x.
 
9.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
 
10.
Juczyński, Z. (2009). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia [Instruments for measurements in health promotion and psychology]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testow Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
 
11.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
 
12.
Kuerbis, A., Armeli, S., & Morgenstern, J. (2013). Motivation and self-efficacy in the context of moderated drinking: Global self-report and ecological momentary assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 934–943. doi: 10.1037/a0031194.
 
13.
Latner, J. D., Mc Leod, G., O’Brien, K. S., & Johnston, L. (2013). The role of self-efficacy, coping, and lapses in weight maintenance. Eating and Weight Disorders: Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 18, 359–366. doi: 10.1007/s40519-013-0068-1.
 
14.
Li, S., Fang, L., Zhou, Y., Pan, L., Yang, X., Li, H., …Jia, C. (2015). Mediation of smoking abstinence self-efficacy on the association of nicotine dependence with smoking cessation. European Journal of Public Health, 25, 200–204. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku183.
 
15.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341.
 
16.
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to Factor-Analyze Your Data Right: Do’s, Don’ts, and How-To’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 97–110.
 
17.
Matsuo, T., Murotake, Y., Kim, M. J., Akiba, T., Shimojo, N., Kim, M. K., & Tanaka, K. (2010). High general self-efficacy is associated with less weight loss under a supervised dietary modification program. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 4, 83–162. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2009.12.00.
 
18.
Nastaskin, R. S., & Fiocco, A. J. (2015). A survey of diet self-efficacy and food intake in students with high and low perceived stress. Nutritional Journal, 14, 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0026-z.
 
19.
Niazi, S., & Malik, N. (2013). Self-efficacy as predictor of motivational goals in university students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 39, 274–280.
 
20.
Ogińska-Bulik, N. (2004). Psychology of excessive eating. Łódź: University of Lodz Press.
 
21.
Rak, E. C. (2014). Employment Outcomes in Persons With Diabetes: The Role of Health Literacy and Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57, 159–169. doi: 10.1177/0034355213500816.
 
22.
Rodin, J., Elias, M., Silberstein, L. R., & Wagner, A. (1988). Combined behavioral and pharmacologic treatment of obesity: Predictors of successful weight maintenance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 399–404. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.3.399.
 
23.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York and London: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
 
24.
Schwarzer, R., & Renner, B. (2000). Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: Action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 19, 487–495. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.487.
 
25.
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.
 
26.
Stich, C., Knauper, B., & Tint, A. (2009). A scenario –Based Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale. The DIET-SE. Assesment, 16, 16–30. doi: 10.1177/1073191108322000.
 
27.
Stotland, S., & Zuroff, D. C. (1991). Relations between multiple measures of dieting self-efficacy and weight change in a behavioral weight control program. Behavior Therapy, 22, 47–59. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80243-6.
 
28.
Wiltink, J., Dippel, A., Szczepanski, M., Thiede, R., Alt, C., & Beutel, M. E. (2007). Long-term weight loss maintenance after inpatient psychotherapy of severely obese patients based on a randomized study: Predictors and maintaining factors of health behavior. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62, 691–698.
 
eISSN:2353-5571
ISSN:2353-4184