ORIGINAL PAPER
Adaptation of the Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire in the Polish context: factorial structure and validity of the scale
| 1 | Faculty for Social Sciences, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Poland |
Submission date: 2015-09-02
Final revision date: 2015-11-05
Acceptance date: 2015-11-06
Online publication date: 2016-01-20
Publication date: 2016-01-25
Health Psychology Report 2016;4(2):170–187
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
quality of life and well beingresearch methodology, measurement, and statistics in health psychology
ABSTRACT
Background
Valid assessment of body image is salient in therapy and rehabilitation of women suffering from breast cancer. Adequate instruments are still lacking in this domain. To overcome this limitation two aims were formulated in the study. First, we tested the factorial structure of the Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire (BIBCQ) developed by Baxter (1998) in Canada, in the Polish context. Then, we tested the construct validity of the scale. The scale is based on a multidimensional concept of the body image of chronically ill individuals proposed by Vamos (1993).
Participants and procedure
A group of 270 women at the mean age of 55 (range of 23-81) with breast cancer who underwent conservation, mastectomy, or lumpectomy surgery was sampled in the Amazonki community.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial structure of the instrument. To test the convergent validity, scales assessing body self, body image, self-esteem, and depression were used. Divergent validity was analyzed in the context of the social desirability construct. Discriminant validity was based on comparisons between women who had undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy surgery. The results showed that within two out of six subscales proposed by Baxter, two additional subscales had to be distinguished. However, some differences in comparisons with previous validation studies were also found.
Conclusions
The BIBCQ scale was found to be a valid multidimensional tool of body image assessment in the Polish context. The results are discussed in terms of cross-cultural differences in body image perception in breast cancer patients and guidelines for the scale’s implementation in the Polish context.
Valid assessment of body image is salient in therapy and rehabilitation of women suffering from breast cancer. Adequate instruments are still lacking in this domain. To overcome this limitation two aims were formulated in the study. First, we tested the factorial structure of the Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire (BIBCQ) developed by Baxter (1998) in Canada, in the Polish context. Then, we tested the construct validity of the scale. The scale is based on a multidimensional concept of the body image of chronically ill individuals proposed by Vamos (1993).
Participants and procedure
A group of 270 women at the mean age of 55 (range of 23-81) with breast cancer who underwent conservation, mastectomy, or lumpectomy surgery was sampled in the Amazonki community.
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the factorial structure of the instrument. To test the convergent validity, scales assessing body self, body image, self-esteem, and depression were used. Divergent validity was analyzed in the context of the social desirability construct. Discriminant validity was based on comparisons between women who had undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy surgery. The results showed that within two out of six subscales proposed by Baxter, two additional subscales had to be distinguished. However, some differences in comparisons with previous validation studies were also found.
Conclusions
The BIBCQ scale was found to be a valid multidimensional tool of body image assessment in the Polish context. The results are discussed in terms of cross-cultural differences in body image perception in breast cancer patients and guidelines for the scale’s implementation in the Polish context.
REFERENCES (60)
1.
Al-Ghazal, S. K., Fallowfield, L., & Blamey, R. W. (2000). Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. European Journal of Cancer, 36, 1938–1943.
2.
Ashing-Giwaa, K. T., Padilla, G. V., Bohorqueza, D. E., Tejeroa, J. S., & Garcia, M. (2006). Understanding the breast cancer experience of Latina women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 3, 19–52.
3.
Baxley, O. K., Kendrick, E. L., & Brown, H. E. (1984). Alopecia: Effect on cancer patients’ body image. Cancer Nursing, 7, 499–503.
4.
Baxter, N. N. (1998). The Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire. The design and testing of a disease specific measure. Toronto: Graduate Department of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto.
5.
Baxter, N. N., Goodwin, P. J., Mcleod, R. S., Dion, R., Devins, G., & Bombardier, C. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire. The Breast Journal, 12, 221–232.
6.
Beck, A., & Steer R. (1993). Beck Depression Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
7.
Ben-Tovim, D., & Walker, M. (1991). The development of Ben-Tovim Walker body attitudes questionnaire (BAQ), a new measures of women’s attitudes towards their own bodies. Psychological Medicine, 21, 775–784.
8.
Berscheid, E., Walster, E., & Bohrnstedt, G. (1973). The happy American Body: A survey report. Psychology Today, 11, 119–131.
9.
Boehmke, M. M., & Dickerson, S. S. (2005). Symptom, symptom experiences, and symptom distress encountered by women with breast cancer undergoing current treatment modalities. Cancer Nursing, 5, 382–389.
10.
Boquiren, V. M., Esplen, M. J., Wong, J., Toner, B., & Warner, E. (2013). Exploring the influence of gender-role socialization and objectified body consciousness on body image disturbance in breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 22, 2177–2185.
11.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
12.
Browne M. W., & Cudeck R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky T. (1990). Body Images, Development, Deviance and Change. New York: The Guliford Press.
15.
Cash, T. F & Pruzinsky, T. (eds.). (2002). Body Image. A Handbook of Theory, Research and Clinical Practice. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
16.
Chen, C. M., Cano, S. J., Klassen, A. F., King, T., McCarthy, C., Cordeiro, P. G., Morrow, M., & Pusic, A. L. (2010). Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. The Breast Journal, 6, 587–597.
17.
Derbis, R. (2000). Doświadczanie codzienności – poczucie jakości życia, swoboda działania, odpowiedzialność, wartości osób bezrobotnych [The experience of everyday life – the quality of life, freedom of action, responsibility, values of the unemployed]. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo WSP.
18.
Derbis, R. (2007). Poczucie jakości życia a zjawiska afektywne [The quality of life and affective phenomena]. In: S. Kowalik (ed.), Społeczne konteksty jakości życia [Social contexts of the quality of life] (pp. 13–52). Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki.
19.
Drwal, R., & Wilczyńska, J. (1980). Opracowanie Kwestionariusza Aprobaty Społecznej [The description of the Social Desirability Questionnaire]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 23, 569–582.
20.
Dzwonkowska, I., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Łaguna, M. (2008). Samoocena i jej pomiar: polska adaptacja skali SES M. Rosenberga: podręcznik [Self-esteem and its measurement: Polish adaptation of the scale of SES M. Rosenberg: manual]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
22.
Fallbjörk, U., Rasmussen, B. H., Karlsson, S., & Salander, P. (2013). Aspects of body image after mastectomy due to breast cancer – A two-year follow-up study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17, 340–345.
23.
Fung, K. W., Lau, Y., Fielding, R., Or, A., & Wai Chun Yip, A. (2001). The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life of Chinese women. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 71, 202–206.
24.
Głębocka, A., & Kulbat, J. (2005). Wizerunek ciała. Portret Polek [Body image. The portrait of Polish women] Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
25.
Goodwin, P. J., Ennis, M., Pritchard, K. L., McCready, D., Koo, J., Sidlofsky, S., Trudeau, M., Hood, N., & Redwood, S. (1999). Adjuvant treatment and onset of menopause predict weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 120–129.
26.
Goncalves, C. O., Gomes, M. C., Tavares, C. F., Neves, A. N., Campana, B., & Cabello, C. (2014). Validation of the instrument “Body image after breast cancer” in Brazil. Motriz, Rio Claro, 20, 8–15.
27.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
28.
Izydorczyk, B., & Bieńkowska, N. (2008). Obraz ja cielesnego – wybrane teoretyczne wątki rozumienia psychologicznych mechanizmów zjawiska [Bodily self image – selected theoretical motifs of understanding psychological mechanisms of the henomenon]. Problemy Medycyny Rodzinnej, 4, 52–58.
29.
Kanatas, A., Velikova, G., Roe, B., Horgan, K. Ghazali, N., Shaw, R. J., & Rogers, S. N. (2012). Patient-reported outcomes in breast oncology: A review of validated outcome instruments. Tumori, 6, 678–688.
30.
Kissane, D. W., Clarke, D. M., Ikin, J., Bloch, S., Smith, G. C., Vitetta, L., & McKenzie, P. (1998). Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early-stage breast cancer: A cross-sectional survey. Medicine Journal of Australia, 169, 192–196.
31.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
32.
Konarski, R. (2010). Modele równań strukturalnych. Teoria i praktyka [Structural Equation Modeling. Theory and practice]. Warszawa: PWN.
33.
Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2015). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. Retrieved from: http://www.personality-project... (10.11.2013).
34.
Kowalik, S. (2000). Jakość życia psychicznego [The quality of psychological life]. In: R. Derbis (ed.), Jakość rozwoju a jakość życia [The quality of development and the quality of life] (pp. 11–32). Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej.
35.
Kowalik, S. (2007). Jakość życia związana ze stanem zdrowia [The quality of life related with the health condition]. In: S. Kowalik (ed.), Społeczne konteksty jakości życia [Social contexts of the quality of life] (pp. 147–171). Bydgoszcz: Uczelniane WSG.
36.
Kowalik, S. (2009). Ja cielesne w psychologii rehabilitacji [Body self in psychology of rehabilitation]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 2, 305–320.
37.
Kroemeke, A. (2011). Rola pozytywnych i negatywnych afektów w procesie radzenia sobie ze stresem osób po zawale serca [The role of positive and negative affects in stress coping process of patients after myocardial infarction]. Psychologia Jakości Życia, 1, 1–19.
38.
Lipowska, M., & Lipowski, M. (2013). Polish normalization of the Body Esteem Scale. Health Psychology Report, 1, 72–81.
39.
Machnik-Czerwik, A. (2014). Obraz ciała i poczucie jakości życia kobiet z rakiem piersi [Body image and the quality of life perception in women with breast cancer]. Unpublished manuscript of doctoral thesis. Casimir the Great Univerity in Bydgoszcz.
40.
Mirucka, B. (2005). Kwestionariusz Ja Cielesnego (Skala J-C) [Body self questionnaire (the J-C scale)]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 48, 313–329.
41.
Mirucka, B. (2003). Poszukiwanie znaczenia cielesności i ja cielesnego [In the search of carnality and body-self]. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 2, 209–223.
42.
Mirucka, B., & Sakson-Obada, O. (2013). Ja cielesne: od normy do zaburzeń [Body Self. When a norm becomes a disorder]. Gdańsk: GWP.
43.
Mock, V. (1993). Body image in women treated for breast cancer. Nursing Research, 42, 153–157.
44.
Montazeri, A. (2008). Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: A bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 27, 1–31.
45.
Parnowski, T., & Jernajczyk, W. (1977). Inwentarz Depresji Becka w ocenie nastroju osób zdrowych i chorych na choroby afektywne [The use of the Beck Depression-Inventory in mood estimation in helathy individuals and individuals with affective disorders]. Psychiatria Polska, 11, 417–421.
46.
Paterson, C. L., Lengacher, C. A., Donovan, K. A., Kip, K. E., & Tofthagen, C. S. (2016). Body Image in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nursin, 39, E39–58.
47.
Pinto, B., & Trunzo, J. (2004). Body esteem and mood among sedentary and active breast cancer survivors. Mayo Clinic Proceeding, 79, 181–186.
48.
R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. From: http://www.personality-project... (Retrieved 1.11.2012).
49.
Raykov, T. (2001). Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 315–323.
50.
Revelle, W. (2011). Package ‘psych’. Retrieved from: http://www.personality-project... (10.11.2013).
51.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Iavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. Retrieved from: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i... (12.11.2013).
52.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: A. von Eye, & C. C. Clogg (eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications to developmental research (pp. 399-419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
54.
Schou, I., Ekeberg, Ř., Sandvik, L., Hjermstad, M. J., & Ruland, C. M. (2005). Multiple predictors of health-related quality of life in early stage breast cancer. Data from a year follow-up study compared with the general population. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1813-1823.
55.
Slade, P. D. (1994). What is body image? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 497-502.
56.
Statistical Office in Krakow. (2012). Zdrowie kobiet w Polsce w latach 2004-2009 [The health of women in Poland between 2004 and 2009]. Retreived from: http://www.stat.gov.pl (12.08.2015).
57.
Stavrou, D., Weissman, O., Polyniki, A., Papageorgiou, N., Haik, J., Farber, N., & Winkler, E. (2009). Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction. Eplasty, 9, e18. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm... (5.11.2015).
58.
Vamos, M. (1993). Body image in chronic illness – a reconceptualization. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 2, 163–178.
59.
Zawisza, K., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Nowak, W., & Kulig, J. (2010). Trafność i rzetelność kwestionariusza oceny jakości życia EORTC QLQ C-30 oraz jego modułu dotyczącego nowotworu piersi (EORTC QLQ BR-23) [Validity and reliability of the quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ BR23)]. Ginekologia Polska, 81, 262-267.
60.
Zhang, J., Zhu, X., Tang, L., Chen, G., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, L. (2014). Psychometric features of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire – Chinese version in women with breast cancer. Journal of Central South University, 39, 73-77.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.