THEORETICAL PAPER
The phonological mistake and 5D paradigm
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy
 
 
Submission date: 2015-08-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2015-11-18
 
 
Acceptance date: 2015-11-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2015-12-30
 
 
Publication date: 2016-01-04
 
 
Health Psychology Report 2016;4(1):1-7
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In the first part of this article I present a background in scientific studies on dyslexia, from cognitive science to the neuropedagogical perspective. In this investigation the analysis of mental processes is the most important thanks to comparison with genetic research. In the second part, the dyslexic condition is seen from the perspective of the neuro-motor approach, named the Praxic Motor Theory, which improves neural circuits and inter-hemispherical exchange, electrical transmission and evoked potentials.
In this perspective, the dyslexia condition is a disorder related to lack of coordination, including disorganization in space-time and lateral dominance. The phonological hypothesis referring to a lack of sign-sound association in dyslexia is inappropriate, as the term phonology has been intended in English literature as a more complex process and not simply an association between phoneme and grapheme. It is related to access to the word, groups of sounds, rather than single sounds. In this sense the dyslexic reader does not make a phonological mistake in terms of association, but a kinetic-motor one, in space-time from left to right.
REFERENCES (34)
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Authors.
 
2.
Bogdanowicz, M. (2000). Integracja percepcyjno-motoryczna. Teoria – diagnoza – terapia [Integration of visual-auditory-motor functions. Theory – diagnosis – therapy]. Warszawa: CMPP-P.
 
3.
Cacciaguerra, F. (1969). Direzionalità e difficoltà motorio-fonetica nella dislessia [Directionality and motor-phonetic difficulties in dyslexia]. Acta Medica Auxologia, 1, 256–266.
 
4.
Chiarenza, G., & Njiokiktjien, C. (2008). Le disprassie dello sviluppo e i disturbi motori associati [Developmental Dispraxia and its related motor disorders]. Amsterdam: Suyi Publications.
 
5.
Chiarenza, G. (1998). Aspetti neurofisiologici dell’Apprendimento. Le difficoltà di apprendere [Neurophysiological aspects of learning. Learning difficulties]. Torino.
 
6.
Chiarenza, G., Di Pietro, S., & Casarotto, S. (2014). The psychophysiology of reading. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 111–119.
 
7.
Crispiani, P., & Capparucci, M. L. (2009). Dislessia, disprassia e motricità [Dyslexia, dyspraxia and motricity]. Psicomotricità, 13, 41–46.
 
8.
Crispiani, P., & Palmieri, E. (2015). Improving the fluidity of whole word reading with a dynamic co‐ordinated movement approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Developmental Differences, 2, 158–183. DOI: 10.3850/S2345734115000277.
 
9.
Crispiani, P. (2012). Dislessia come disprassia sequenziale [Dyslexia as sequential dyspraxia]. Parma: Junior-Spaggiari.
 
10.
de Ajuriaguerra, J. (1974). Manuel de Psychiatrie de l’Enfant [Child Psychiatry Manual]. Milano: Masson.
 
11.
Fabbro, F., Moretti, R., & Bava, A. (2000). Language impairments in patients with cerebellar lesions. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 173–188.
 
12.
Hatcher, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). The phonological representations hypothesis of dyslexia: from theory to practice. In: G. Reid, & J. Wearmouth (eds.), Dyslexia and literacy. Theory and practice (pp. 69–83). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
 
13.
Jadoulle, A. (1962). Apprentissage de la lecutre et dyslexie [Learning to read and dyslexia]. Presses Universitaires de France.
 
14.
Macintyre, C. (2000). Dyspraxia in the early years: Identifying and supporting children with movement difficulties. London: David Fulton.
 
15.
Mounstephen, M. (2011). How to detect developmental delay and what to do next. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
 
16.
Mucchielli-Bourcier, A. (2004). La prévention de la dyslexie à l’école [Preventing dyslexia at school]. Paris: L’harmattan.
 
17.
Nicholson, R. L., & Fawcett, A. J. (1995). Dyslexia is more than a phonological disability. Dyslexia, 1, 19–36.
 
18.
Nicholson, R. L., & Fawcett, A. J. (2010). Dyslexia, learning, and the brain. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
 
19.
Nicholson, R. L., Fawcett, A. J., & Dean, P. (2001). Dyslexia, development and the cerebellum. Trends Neuroscience, 24, 515–516.
 
20.
Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., Brookes, R. L., & Needle, J. (2010). Procedural learning and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16, 194–212. DOI: 10.1002/dys.408.
 
21.
Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (2011). Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum. Cortex, 47, 117–127 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.016.
 
22.
Oliviero, A. (2001). Motricità, linguaggio e apprendimento [Motricity, language and learning]. Scuola e Città, 1, 6–18.
 
23.
Orton, S. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children: A presentation of certain types of disorders in the development of the language faculty. New York: W. W. Norton.
 
24.
Parisi, A. (1999). I bambini dallo sguardo sfuggente [Children who do not look you in the eye]. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
 
25.
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2006). Language skills, learning to read and reading intervention. London Review of Education, 4, 63–76.
 
26.
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.
 
27.
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read. The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience, 20, 147–152.
 
28.
Stein, J. (2001a). The sensory basis of reading problems. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 509–534. DOI: 10.1207/S15326942DN2002_4.
 
29.
Stein, J. (2001b). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 12–36.
 
30.
Stein, J. (2015, April). Visual dyslexia and its treatment. In: J. Stein (chair), Wobbles, Warbles and Fish – The Neurology of Dyslexia. Seminar conducted at the meeting of Malta Dyslexia Association, Malta.
 
31.
Tallal, S., Miller, S., & Fitch, H. (1995). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the pre-eminence of temporal processing. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 16, 194–219.
 
32.
Tulukdar, A. (2012). Dyspraxia/DCS. Teacher’s Pocketbook. Hampshire: Laurel House.
 
33.
Witruk, E. (2011). Overview of assessment and treatment methods for dyslexia – with special reference to alternative methods. Ad Verba Liberorum, 3, 4–18.
 
34.
Wolff, P. H., Cohen, C., & Drake, C. (1984). Impaired motor timing control in specific reading retardation. Neuropsychologia, 22, 587–600.
 
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2353-5571
ISSN:2353-4184
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top