ORIGINAL PAPER
Researching researchers: exploring the challenges of conducting research during a pandemic
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
 
2
Alberta Health Service, Edmonton, Canada
 
3
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
 
 
Submission date: 2023-11-21
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-03-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-04-17
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-06-10
 
 
Corresponding author
Tanya Beran   

University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Research assistants (RAs) are vital for the successful completion of research. When data collection and recruitment are dis-rupted, like during the COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying restrictions, the effects on RAs attempting to conduct re-search are unclear.

Participants and procedure:
This study explored RAs’ perspectives of conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five RAs who had begun collecting data at a mid-western children’s hospital on how a robot named MEDi® could help patients uphold health and safety procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results:
Thematic analysis of the interview data identified four key themes (and sub-themes) that reflected RAs’ experiences of con-ducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic: inspiration and motivation; research barriers; human connections and relationships; and creativity and problem-solving. The first theme focused on the sources of RAs’ inspiration and motivation to participate in research; the second focused on the barriers that affected data collection and recruitment. The third theme described the impact that human connections and relationships had on the success of the research, and the final theme explored the RAs’ creativity and problem-solving approaches, which aided in navigating the challenges faced during the pandemic. The RAs overcame the challenges with positive attitudes, creativity, and collaboration.

Conclusions:
Overall, the results reveal how the RAs explored creative strategies to adapt research methods to suit unanticipated circum-stances and develop interpersonal skills to facilitate participation in future research and career activities.

 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Alberta Health Services (2022, August 19). Family/designated support person and visitors of patients: COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.albertahealthservi....
 
2.
Aksoy, H., Ayhan B. D., Fidancı, İ., Arsava, E. Y., & Cankurtaran, M. (2021). Family medicine research assistants’ experiences during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75, e13975. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.1....
 
3.
Anwar, N. H., & Viqar, S. (2017). Research assistants, reflexivity, and the politics of fieldwork in urban Pakistan. Area, 49, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.1....
 
4.
Beran, T. N., Pearson, J. R., & Lashewicz, B. (2021). Implementation of a humanoid robot as an innovative ap-proach to child life interventions in a children’s hospital: Lofty goal or tangible reality? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 639394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
 
5.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/978145....
 
6.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Phenomenological research. In H. Salmon, J. Scappini, C. Pearson, & L. Lar-son (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed., pp. 75–82). Sage.
 
7.
Farrier, C. E., Pearson, J. D. R., & Beran, T. N. (2020). Children’s fear and pain during medical procedures: a quali-ty improvement study with a humanoid robot. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52, 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/084456....
 
8.
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Duques-ne University Press.
 
9.
Kaplan, L., Kuhnt, J., & Steinert, J. I. (2020). Do no harm? Field research in the global south: Ethical challenges faced by research staff, World Development, 127, 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worl....
 
10.
Larkin, M., Flowers, P., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory method and re-search (2nd ed.). Sage.
 
11.
Mehta, U. M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Chandra, P. S. (2020). The “mind” behind the “mask”: Assessing men-tal states and creating therapeutic alliance amidst COVID-19. Schizophrenia Research, 222, 503–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schr....
 
12.
Mitchell, K., Rekiere, J., & Grassley, J. S. (2020). The influence of undergraduate research assistant experiences on future nursing roles. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prof....
 
13.
Naufel, K. Z., & Beike, D. R. (2013). The ethical treatment of research assistants: Are we forsaking safety for sci-ence? Journal of Research Practice, 9, M11.
 
14.
Nelson, P., & Petrova, M. G. (2022). Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship. Learned Pub-lishing, 35, 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1....
 
15.
Nguyen, P., Scheyvens, R., Beban, A., & Gardyne, S. (2022). From a distance: The ‘new normal’ for researchers and research assistants engaged in remote fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940....
 
16.
Reiners, G. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care, 1, 119. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1....
 
17.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedp....
 
18.
Shadmi, E., Chen, Y., & Dourado, I. (2020). Health equity and COVID-19: Global perspectives. International Jour-nal of Equity Health, 19, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939....
 
19.
Southerton, C., Clark, M., Watson, A., & Lupton, D. (2022). The future of qualitative research in the.
 
20.
COVID-19 era: Experimenting with creative and digital methods. In S. Matthewman (Ed.), A research agenda for COVID-19 and society (pp. 155–174). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/978180....
 
21.
Ten Hulzen, R. D., & Fabry, D. A. (2020). Impact of hearing loss and universal face masking in the COVID-19 era. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95, 2069–2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayo....
 
22.
Tremblay, S., Castiglione, S., Audet, L. A., Desmarais, M., Horace, M., & Peláez, S. (2021). Conducting qualitative research to respond to COVID-19 challenges: Reflections for the present and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940....
 
23.
Zhou, T., Law, R., & Lee, P. C. (2022). What motivates me? Motivation to conduct research of academics in teach-ing-oriented universities in China. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure Sport, & Tourism Education, 31, 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhls....
 
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
eISSN:2353-5571
ISSN:2353-4184
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top