ORIGINAL PAPER
Knowledge of attention/deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) – a comparison of pre-service teachers in primary and special education in Germany
Submission date: 2015-07-11
Acceptance date: 2015-09-04
Online publication date: 2015-09-21
Publication date: 2015-09-14
Health Psychology Report 2015;3(3):237-245
KEYWORDS
primary educationspecial educationuniversity curriculumknowledge accuracyknowledge of attention deficit disorders scale (KADDS)
TOPICS
including prevention and promotionthe individual-health care system interface, particularly communication, and psychologically- based interventionschild and adolescent healthquality of life and well being
ABSTRACT
Background
Given that the majority of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) attend regular classroom settings in Germany, it is necessary for teachers to be well prepared to provide these children appropriate care and education on the basis of accurate knowledge of ADHD. Pre-service teachers should have enough learning possibilities in their curriculum about ADHD. The purpose of this study was to investigate German pre-service teachers’ knowledge of ADHD by differentiating between their future school type, their study progress, their learning experiences, gender, and age.
Participants and procedure
The participants were 234 pre-service teachers of the University of Leipzig, Germany. The survey instrument constructed by Lee (2015) was slightly modified for pre-service teachers, and consists of the three subscales: (a) characteristics of ADHD, (b) causes of ADHD, and (c) subtypes of ADHD.
Results
Total accuracy of the knowledge of German pre-service teachers was 51.60%, inaccuracy was 21.60%, and no information was 25.80%. German pre-service teachers who majored in special education have a significantly higher accuracy rate than those who majored in primary education. The knowledge profiles consisting of total knowledge score and three domain-specific subscores can be explained significantly (ANOVAs) by the main effects and the interactions among the independent factors (a) future school type, (b) study progress, (c) experience by curriculum, and (d) personal experience. It was possible to discriminate significantly four pre-service teacher groups (differentiated by future school type and study progress) on the basis of their knowledge profiles by a discriminant analysis.
Conclusions
Teachers are an important target group for ADHD research because they play a major role in early diagnosis of ADHD as well as supporting their development. During their education, pre-service teachers need to be prepared for dealing appropriately with ADHD children in the classroom. This study provides a basic investigation of German pre-service teachers’ needs of learning how to deal with ADHD children.
Given that the majority of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) attend regular classroom settings in Germany, it is necessary for teachers to be well prepared to provide these children appropriate care and education on the basis of accurate knowledge of ADHD. Pre-service teachers should have enough learning possibilities in their curriculum about ADHD. The purpose of this study was to investigate German pre-service teachers’ knowledge of ADHD by differentiating between their future school type, their study progress, their learning experiences, gender, and age.
Participants and procedure
The participants were 234 pre-service teachers of the University of Leipzig, Germany. The survey instrument constructed by Lee (2015) was slightly modified for pre-service teachers, and consists of the three subscales: (a) characteristics of ADHD, (b) causes of ADHD, and (c) subtypes of ADHD.
Results
Total accuracy of the knowledge of German pre-service teachers was 51.60%, inaccuracy was 21.60%, and no information was 25.80%. German pre-service teachers who majored in special education have a significantly higher accuracy rate than those who majored in primary education. The knowledge profiles consisting of total knowledge score and three domain-specific subscores can be explained significantly (ANOVAs) by the main effects and the interactions among the independent factors (a) future school type, (b) study progress, (c) experience by curriculum, and (d) personal experience. It was possible to discriminate significantly four pre-service teacher groups (differentiated by future school type and study progress) on the basis of their knowledge profiles by a discriminant analysis.
Conclusions
Teachers are an important target group for ADHD research because they play a major role in early diagnosis of ADHD as well as supporting their development. During their education, pre-service teachers need to be prepared for dealing appropriately with ADHD children in the classroom. This study provides a basic investigation of German pre-service teachers’ needs of learning how to deal with ADHD children.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
2.
Anderson, D. L., Watt, S. E., Noble, W., & Shanley, D. C. (2012). Knowledge of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and attitudes toward teaching children with ADHD: the role of teaching experience. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 511-525.
3.
Arcia, E., Frank, R., Sanchez-LaCay, A., & Fernáindez, M. C. (2000). Teacher understanding of ADHD as reflected in attributions and classroom strategies. Journal of Attention Disorders, 4, 91-101.
4.
Barkley, R. A. (2007). School interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Where to from here? School Psychology Review, 36, 279-286.
5.
Bekle, B. (2004). Knowledge and attitudes about attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A comparison between practicing teachers and undergraduate education students. Journal of Attention Disorders, 7, 151-161.
6.
Canu, W. H., & Mancil, E. B. (2012). An examination of teacher trainees’ knowledge of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. School Mental Health, 105-114.
7.
Holz, T., & Lessing, A. (2002). Reflections on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an inclusive education system: research paper. Perspectives in Education, 20, 103-110.
8.
Kang, K.-R., Kim, Y.-H., & Yang, Y.-O. (2011). Teaching status and knowledge of elementary school teachers of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 17, 136-144.
9.
Kos, J. M. (2004). Primary school teachers’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours toward children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
10.
Kos, J. M., Richdale, A. L., & Hay, D. A. (2006). Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and their teachers: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53, 147-160.
11.
Kos, J. M., Richdale, A. L., & Jackson, M. S. (2004). Knowledge about attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparison of in-service and pre service teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 517-526.
12.
Lee, Y. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, and classroom management strategies regarding students with ADHD: A cross-cultural comparison of teachers in South Korea and Germany (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
13.
Martin, A. J. (2014). The role of ADHD in academic adversity: Disentangling ADHD effects from other personal and contextual factors. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 395-408.
14.
Murray, E. (2009). “Don’t give up on them”: Managing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in schools – what teachers and parents believe and know (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
15.
Ohan, J. L., Cormier, N., Hepp, S. L., Visser, T. A. W., & Strain, M. C. (2008). Does knowledge about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder impact teachers’ reported behaviors and perceptions? School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 436-449.
16.
Perold, M., Louw, C., & Kleynhans, S. (2010). Primary school teachers’ knowledge and misperceptions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). South African Journal of Education, 30, 457-473.
17.
Sax, L., & Kautz, K. J. (2003). Who first suggests the diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 171-174.
18.
Schlack, R., Hölling, H., Kurth, B.-M., & Huss, M. (2007). Die Prävalenz der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Erste Ergebnisse aus dem Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS) [The prevalence of ADHD in children and adolescents in Germany. First results from the child and adolescents health survey (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 50, 827-835.
19.
Schmiedeler, S. (2013). Wissen und Fehlannahmen von deutschen Lehrkräften über die Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) [German teachers’ knowledge and misperceptions about ADHD]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 60, 143-153.
20.
Sciutto, M. J., Terjesen, M. D., & Bender Frank, A. S. (2000). Teachers’ knowledge and misperceptions of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 115-122.
21.
Taanila, A., Ebeling, H., Tiihala, M., Kaakinen, M., Moilanen, I., Hurtig, T., & Yliherva, A. (2014). Association between childhood specific learning difficulties and school performance in adolescents with and without ADHD symptoms: a 16-year follow-up. Journal of Attention Disorder, 18, 61-72.
22.
Vereb, R. L., & DiPerna, J. C. (2004). Teachers’ knowledge of ADHD, treatments for ADHD, and treatment acceptability: An initial investigation. School Psychology Review, 33, 421-428.
23.
West, J., Taylor, M., Houghton, S., & Hudyma, S. (2005). A comparison of teachers’ and parents’ knowledge and beliefs about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). School Psychology International, 26, 192-208.
24.
Wolraich, M. L., & DuPaul, G. J. (2010). ADHD diagnosis and management: a practical guide for the clinic and the classroom. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
Copyright: © Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
| eISSN: | 2353-5571 |
| ISSN: | 2353-4184 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
