ORIGINAL PAPER
Functional lateralization of tool-sound and action-word processing in a bilingual brain
| 1 | Faculty of Educational Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland |
| 2 | Action and Cognition Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland |
| 3 | Department of Neuroscience, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States |
Submission date: 2019-11-20
Final revision date: 2020-01-10
Acceptance date: 2020-01-10
Online publication date: 2020-01-31
Publication date: 2020-01-31
Health Psychology Report 2020;8(1):10–30
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
health attitudes and behaviorincluding prevention and promotionchild and adolescent healthlifespan approaches to health, including those related to older adultsquality of life and well being
ABSTRACT
Background:
The impact of bilingualism on lateralized brain functions such as praxis – the control of skilled actions – and language representations themselves, particularly in the auditory domain, is still largely unknown. Recent stud-ies suggest that bilingualism affects both basic (fundamental frequency) sound and action-related speech pro-cessing. Whether it can impact non-verbal action sound processing is a question of debate.
Participants and procedure:
Here we examined twenty bilinguals using a dichotic listening paradigm, in which in addition to repeating the just heard action words, participants named – in Polish or English – one of two simultaneously presented tool sounds from attended ears. The results were compared with data from these same participants tested with reading the same words in a visual-half field paradigm.
Results:
In contrast to typical outcomes from monolinguals, the laterality indices of action-related sound processing (verbal and non-verbal) were not left lateralized but hemispherically balanced. Notably, despite similar organi-zation of tool- and action-word sound processing, their auditory (balanced) and visual-language (left-lateralized) representations might be independent because there were no significant correlations between any of their laterality indices.
Conclusions:
This indicates that bilingualism might involve reshuffling/reorganization of typically lateralized brain functions and such plasticity will have consequences for second language learning strategies, as well as for neuroreha-bilitation.
The impact of bilingualism on lateralized brain functions such as praxis – the control of skilled actions – and language representations themselves, particularly in the auditory domain, is still largely unknown. Recent stud-ies suggest that bilingualism affects both basic (fundamental frequency) sound and action-related speech pro-cessing. Whether it can impact non-verbal action sound processing is a question of debate.
Participants and procedure:
Here we examined twenty bilinguals using a dichotic listening paradigm, in which in addition to repeating the just heard action words, participants named – in Polish or English – one of two simultaneously presented tool sounds from attended ears. The results were compared with data from these same participants tested with reading the same words in a visual-half field paradigm.
Results:
In contrast to typical outcomes from monolinguals, the laterality indices of action-related sound processing (verbal and non-verbal) were not left lateralized but hemispherically balanced. Notably, despite similar organi-zation of tool- and action-word sound processing, their auditory (balanced) and visual-language (left-lateralized) representations might be independent because there were no significant correlations between any of their laterality indices.
Conclusions:
This indicates that bilingualism might involve reshuffling/reorganization of typically lateralized brain functions and such plasticity will have consequences for second language learning strategies, as well as for neuroreha-bilitation.
REFERENCES (102)
1.
Alladi, S., Bak, T. H., Mekala, S., Rajan, A., Chaudhuri, J. R., Mioshi, E., Krovvidi, R., Surampudi, B., Duggirala, V., & Kaul, S. (2016). Impact of bilingualism on cognitive outcome after stroke. Stroke, 47, 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKE....
2.
Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Corballis, M. C., & Haberling, I. S. (2016). Complementarity or independence of hemispheric specializations? A brief review. Neuropsychologia, 93, 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
3.
Bak, T. H., Long, M. R., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Sorace, A. (2016). Novelty, challenge, and practice: The impact of intensive language learning on attentional functions. PLoS One, 11, e0153485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
4.
Bechtold, L., Ghio, M., Antoch, G., Turowski, B., Wittsack, H. J., Tettamanti, M., & Bellebaum, C. (2019). How words get meaning: The neural processing of novel object names after sensorimotor training. NeuroImage, 197, 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
5.
Bernardis, P., & Gentilucci, M. (2006). Speech and gesture share the same communication system. Neuropsychologia, 44, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
6.
Bialystok, E., Abutalebi, J., Bak, T. H., Burke, D. M., & Kroll, J. F. (2016). Aging in two languages: Implications for public health. Ageing Research Reviews, 27, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.....
7.
Bidula, S. P., & Kroliczak, G. (2015). Structural asymmetry of the insula is linked to the lateralization of gesture and language. European Journal of Neuroscience, 41, 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12....
8.
Bidula, S. P., Przybylski, L., Pawlak, M. A., & Kroliczak, G. (2017). Unique neural characteristics of atypical lateralization of language in healthy individuals. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
9.
Biggio, M., Bisio, A., Avanzino, L., Ruggeri, P., & Bove, M. (2017). This racket is not mine: The influ-ence of the tool-use on peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 103, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
10.
Binkofski, F., & Buccino, G. (2004). Motor functions of the Broca’s region. Brain and Language, 89, 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-....
11.
Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., von Koss Torkildsen, J., Gudmundsen, M., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2015). Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality, 20, 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
12.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2009). Word order and Broca’s region: Evidence for a supra-syntactic perspective. Brain and Language, 111, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
13.
Bourquin, N. M., Simonin, A., & Clarke, S. (2013). Repetition-induced plasticity of motor representa-tions of action sounds. Brain Topography, 26, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548....
14.
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to ac-tion-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogb....
15.
Burgaleta, M., Sanjuan, A., Ventura-Campos, N., Sebastian-Galles, N., & Avila, C. (2016). Bilingualism at the core of the brain. Structural differences between bilinguals and monolinguals revealed by subcortical shape analysis. NeuroImage, 125, 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
16.
Clarke, S., & Geiser, E. (2015). Roaring lions and chirruping lemurs: How the brain encodes sound objects in space. Neuropsychologia, 75, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
17.
Corballis, M. C. (2003). From mouth to hand: Gesture, speech, and the evolution of right-handedness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S01405....
18.
Corballis, M. C. (2010). Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain and Language, 112, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
19.
Corballis, M. C. (2017) The evolution of lateralized brain circuits. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1021.
21.
Costa, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2014). How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn370....
22.
Crivelli, D., Rueda, M. S., & Balconi, M. (2018). Linguistic and motor representations of everyday complex actions: an fNIRS investigation. Brain Structure and Function, 223, 2989–2997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429....
23.
D’Ausilio, A., Pulvermuller, F., Salmas, P., Bufalari, I., Begliomini, C., & Fadiga, L. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19, 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.....
24.
de Borst, A. W., Valente, G., Jaaskelainen, I. P., & Tikka, P. (2016). Brain-based decoding of mentally imagined film clips and sounds reveals experience-based information patterns in film profession-als. NeuroImage, 129, 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
25.
Dotan, D., & Friedmann, N. (2015). Steps towards understanding the phonological output buffer and its role in the production of numbers, morphemes, and function words. Cortex, 63, 317–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cort....
26.
Dragovic, M. (2004). Towards an improved measure of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: a one-factor congeneric measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality, 9, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
27.
Duffy, M., Waitt, G., & Harada, T. (2016). Making sense of sound: Visceral sonic mapping as a research tool. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emos....
28.
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0953....
29.
Felton, A., Vazquez, D., Ramos-Nunez, A. I., Greene, M. R., McDowell, A., Hernandez, A. E., & Chiarello, C. (2017). Bilingualism influences structural indices of interhemispheric organization. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneu....
30.
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/174702....
31.
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-....
32.
Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physio-logical Reviews, 91, 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physre....
33.
Friederici, A. D., & Alter, K. (2004). Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language, 89, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-....
34.
Gainotti, G. (2015). The influence of handedness on hemispheric representation of tools: a survey. Brain and Cognition, 94, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
35.
Galati, G., Committeri, G., Spitoni, G., Aprile, T., Di Russo, F., Pitzalis, S., & Pizzamiglio, L. (2008). A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. NeuroImage, 40, 1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
36.
Garcia-Penton, L., Perez Fernandez, A., Iturria-Medina, Y., Gillon-Dowens, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Anatomical connectivity changes in the bilingual brain. NeuroImage, 84, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
37.
Gentilucci, M., Campione, G. C., Dalla Volta, R., & Bernardis, P. (2009). The observation of manual grasp actions affects the control of speech: a combined behavioral and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3190–3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
38.
Gentilucci, M., & Corballis, M. C. (2006). From manual gesture to speech: a gradual transition. Neuro-science & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neub....
39.
Grundy, J. G., Anderson, J. A. E., & Bialystok, E. (2017). Bilinguals have more complex EEG brain signals in occipital regions than monolinguals. NeuroImage, 159, 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
40.
Haberling, I. S., & Corballis, M. C. (2015). Cerebellar asymmetry, cortical asymmetry and handedness: Two independent networks. Laterality, 19, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
41.
Haberling, I. S., Corballis, P. M., & Corballis, M. C. (2016). Language, gesture, and handedness: Evi-dence for independent lateralized networks. Cortex, 82, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cort....
42.
Hartanto, A., & Yang, H. (2019). Does early active bilingualism enhance inhibitory control and monitor-ing? A propensity-matching analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm000....
43.
Helmich, I., Holle, H., Rein, R., & Lausberg, H. (2015). Brain oxygenation patterns during the execution of tool use demonstration, tool use pantomime, and body-part-as-object tool use. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 96, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijps....
44.
Helon, H., & Kroliczak, G. (2014). The effects of visual half-field priming on the categorization of fa-miliar intransitive gestures, tool use pantomimes, and meaningless hand movements. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
45.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-....
46.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn211....
47.
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Neural basis of speech perception. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 129, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
48.
Huang, K., Itoh, K., Kwee, I. L., & Nakada, T. (2012). Neural strategies for reading Japanese and Chi-nese sentences: a cross-linguistic fMRI study of character-decoding and morphosyntax. Neuropsy-chologia, 50, 2598–2604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
49.
Hugdahl, K. (2012). Auditory laterality: Dichotic listening and fMRI studies. Advances in Clinical Neu-roscience and Rehabilitation, 11, 23–24.
50.
Hull, R., & Vaid, J. (2007). Bilingual language lateralization: a meta-analytic tale of two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1987–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
51.
Hund-Georgiadis, M., Lex, U., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Non-invasive regime for language lateralization in right- and left-handers by means of functional MRI and dichotic listening. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221....
52.
Hunter, Z. R., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 46, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
53.
Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sci-ence, 8, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics....
54.
Johnson-Frey, S. H., Newman-Norlund, R., & Grafton, S. T. (2005). A distributed left hemisphere net-work active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor....
55.
Joliot, M., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., & Mazoyer, B. (2016). Intra-hemispheric intrinsic connectivity asym-metry and its relationships with handedness and language lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 93, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
56.
Kim, S. Y., Qi, T., Feng, X., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Cao, F. (2016). How does language distance between L1 and L2 affect the L2 brain network? An fMRI study of Korean-Chinese-English trilinguals. Neu-roImage, 129, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
57.
Kimura, D. (2011). From ear to brain. Brain and Cognition, 76, 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
59.
Klichowski, M., & Kroliczak, G. (2017). Numbers and functional lateralization: a visual half-field and dichotic listening study in proficient bilinguals. Neuropsychologia, 100, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
60.
Knecht, S., Drager, B., Deppe, M., Bobe, L., Lohmann, H., Floel, A., Ringelstein, E. B., & Henningsen, H. (2000). Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123, 2512–2518. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/....
61.
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846–848. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
62.
Krefta, M., Michalowski, B., Kowalczyk, J., & Kroliczak, G. (2015). Co-lateralized bilingual mecha-nisms for reading in single and dual language contexts: Evidence from visual half-field processing of action words in proficient bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
63.
Kroliczak, G., Piper, B. J., & Frey, S. H. (2011). Atypical lateralization of language predicts cerebral asymmetries in parietal gesture representations. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1698–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
64.
Kroliczak, G., Piper, B. J., & Frey, S. H. (2016). Specialization of the left supramarginal gyrus for hand-independent praxis representation is not related to hand dominance. Neuropsychologia, 93, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
65.
Kroliczak, G., Westwood, D. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). Differential effects of advance semantic cues on grasping, naming, and manual estimation. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221....
66.
Kuhl, P. K., Stevenson, J., Corrigan, N. M., van den Bosch, J. J. F., Can, D. D., & Richards, T. (2016). Neuroimaging of the bilingual brain: Structural brain correlates of listening and speaking in a second language. Brain and Language, 162, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
67.
Lane, C., Kanjlia, S., Richardson, H., Fulton, A., Omaki, A., & Bedny, M. (2017). Reduced left laterali-zation of language in congenitally blind individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a....
68.
Lewis, J. W. (2006). Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist, 12, 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385....
69.
Lewis, J. W., Brefczynski, J. A., Phinney, R. E., Janik, J. J., & DeYoe, E. A. (2005). Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 5148–5158. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEURO....
70.
Lewis, J. W., Phinney, R. E., Brefczynski-Lewis, J. A., & DeYoe, E. A. (2006). Lefties get it „right” when hearing tool sounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1314-1330. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2....
71.
Lewis, J. W., Silberman, M. J., Donai, J. J., Frum, C.A., & Brefczynski-Lewis, J. A. (2018). Hearing and orally mimicking different acoustic-semantic categories of natural sound engage distinct left hemisphere cortical regions. Brain and Language, 183, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
72.
Liegeois, F., Connelly, A., Baldeweg, T., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2008). Speaking with a single cerebral hemisphere: fMRI language organization after hemispherectomy in childhood. Brain and Language, 106, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
73.
Liu, H., & Cao, F. (2016). L1 and L2 processing in the bilingual brain: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 159, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
74.
McNair, N. A., & Harris, I. M. (2012). Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representa-tions in the recognition of manipulable objects. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221....
75.
Michel, G. F. (2017). How might the relation of the development of hand preferences to the develop-ment of cognitive functions be examined during infancy: a sketch? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.....
76.
Nakada, T., Fujii, Y., & Kwee, I. L. (2001). Brain strategies for reading in the second language are de-termined by the first language. Neuroscience Research, 40, 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-....
77.
Nelson, J. R., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2009). Assimilation and accommodation patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex in learning a second writing system. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20....
78.
Oertel, D., Cao, X. J., Ison, J. R., & Allen, P. D. (2017). Cellular computations underlying detection of gaps in sounds and lateralizing sound sources. Trends in Neurosciences, 40, 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins....
79.
Oltedal, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2017). Opposite brain laterality in analogous auditory and visual tests. Lat-erality, 22, 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
80.
Park, H. R., Badzakova-Trajkov, G., & Waldie, K. E. (2012). Language lateralisation in late proficient bilinguals: a lexical decision fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 50, 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
81.
Peng, G., & Wang, W. S. (2011). Hemisphere lateralization is influenced by bilingual status and com-position of words. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1981–1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
82.
Poeppel, D. (2001). Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognitive Science, 25, 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516....
83.
Przybylski, L., & Kroliczak, G. (2017). Planning functional grasps of simple tools invokes the hand-independent praxis representation network: an fMRI study. Journal of the International Neuropsycho-logical Society, 23, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S13556....
84.
Pulvermuller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn281....
85.
Reifegerste, J., Elin, K., & Clahsen, H. (2019). Persistent differences between native speakers and late bilinguals: Evidence from inflectional and derivational processing in older speakers. Bilingual-ism: Language and Cognition, 22, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S13667....
86.
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Matelli, M., Bettinardi, V., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., & Fazio, F. (1996). Locali-zation of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research, 111, 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0022....
87.
Schneider, D. M., Sundararajan, J., & Mooney, R. (2018). A cortical filter that learns to suppress the acoustic consequences of movement. Nature, 561, 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586....
88.
Skoe, E., Burakiewicz, E., Figueiredo, M., & Hardin, M. (2017). Basic neural processing of sound in adults is influenced by bilingual experience. Neuroscience, 349, 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
89.
Somers, M., Aukes, M. F., Ophoff, R. A., Boks, M. P., Fleer, W., de Visser, K. C., Kahn, R. S., & Sommer, I. E. (2015). On the relationship between degree of hand-preference and degree of lan-guage lateralization. Brain and Language, 144, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
90.
Stein, M., Winkler, C., Kaiser, A., & Dierks, T. (2014). Structural brain changes related to bilingualism: Does immersion make a difference? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.....
91.
Styrkowiec, P. P., Nowik, A. M., & Kroliczak, G. (2019). The neural underpinnings of haptically guided functional grasping of tools: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 194, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
92.
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Feng, C. M., Siok, W. T., Perfetti, C. A., Xiong, J., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2003). Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10....
93.
Tivarus, M. E., Starling, S. J., Newport, E. L., & Langfitt, J. T. (2012). Homotopic language reorganiza-tion in the right hemisphere after early left hemisphere injury. Brain and Language, 123, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
94.
Van der Haegen, L., Cai, Q., Seurinck, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). Further fMRI validation of the visual half field technique as an indicator of language laterality: a large-group analysis. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
95.
van der Noort, M., Struys, E., Kim, K., Bosch, P., Mondt, K., van Kralingen, R., Lee, M., & van de Craen, P. (2014). Multilingual processing in the brain. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11, 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/147907....
96.
Veale, J. F. (2014). Edinburgh Handedness Inventory – Short Form: a revised version based on con-firmatory factor analysis. Laterality, 19, 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
97.
Verma, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). A right visual field advantage for tool-recognition in the visual half-field paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2342–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
98.
Vingerhoets, G., Acke, F., Alderweireldt, A. S., Nys, J., Vandemaele, P., & Achten, E. (2012). Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: Same pattern, different strength. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21....
99.
Vingerhoets, G., Alderweireldt, A. S., Vandemaele, P., Cai, Q., Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Achten, E. (2013). Praxis and language are linked: Evidence from co-lateralization in individuals with atypical language dominance. Cortex, 49, 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cort....
100.
Wild, C. J., Linke, A. C., Zubiaurre-Elorza, L., Herzmann, C., Duffy, H., Han, V. K., Lee, D. S. C., & Cusack, R. (2017). Adult-like processing of naturalistic sounds in auditory cortex by 3- and 9-month old infants. NeuroImage, 157, 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neur....
101.
Willemin, J., Hausmann, M., Brysbaert, M., Dael, N., Chmetz, F., Fioravera, A., Gieruc, K., & Mohr, C. (2016). Stability of right visual field advantage in an international lateralized lexical decision task ir-respective of participants’ sex, handedness or bilingualism. Laterality, 21, 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/135765....
102.
Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2017). Brain potentials predict language selection before speech onset in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 171, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.band....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.