ORIGINAL PAPER
Interactive effects between flexible and rigid control of eating behavior on body weight: a moderated serial multiple mediation model
| 1 | University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria |
Submission date: 2017-06-06
Final revision date: 2017-07-09
Acceptance date: 2017-07-10
Online publication date: 2017-09-26
Publication date: 2017-09-22
Health Psychology Report 2017;5(4):314–322
KEYWORDS
body mass indexcognitive restraintRigid controlFlexible controlFood cravingsrigid controlflexible controlfood cravings
TOPICS
psychosocial factors in the etiology of illnesseshealth attitudes and behaviorresearch methodology, measurement, and statistics in health psychology
ABSTRACT
Background
Cognitive restraint of eating can be subdivided into rigid control and flexible control of eating behavior. Flexible control appears to be a more favorable dieting strategy as it relates to lower disinhibited eating and body mass index (BMI), while the opposite is found for rigid control. Yet, previous findings also suggest interactive effects between the two such that rigid control is particularly related to higher BMI when flexible control is low.
Participants and procedure
Data from a previously reported study (Meule, Westenhöfer, & Kübler, 2011) were reanalyzed to examine such interactive effects (N = 615, 76% female).
Results
Higher rigid control was particularly associated with more frequent and intense food cravings, lower perceived self-regulatory success in weight regulation, and higher BMI at low levels of flexible control. A moderated serial multiple mediation model revealed that rigid control had an indirect effect on BMI through food cravings and perceived self-regulatory success, particularly when flexible control was low. These interactive effects could largely be replicated in a second study with female participants (n = 70).
Conclusions
The current findings replicate and extend previous reports in that high flexible control may “compensate” for high rigid control, that is, attenuate the effect of rigid control on eating behaviors and body weight. They also provide insights into the mediating mechanisms that link rigid and flexible control of eating behavior with BMI.
Cognitive restraint of eating can be subdivided into rigid control and flexible control of eating behavior. Flexible control appears to be a more favorable dieting strategy as it relates to lower disinhibited eating and body mass index (BMI), while the opposite is found for rigid control. Yet, previous findings also suggest interactive effects between the two such that rigid control is particularly related to higher BMI when flexible control is low.
Participants and procedure
Data from a previously reported study (Meule, Westenhöfer, & Kübler, 2011) were reanalyzed to examine such interactive effects (N = 615, 76% female).
Results
Higher rigid control was particularly associated with more frequent and intense food cravings, lower perceived self-regulatory success in weight regulation, and higher BMI at low levels of flexible control. A moderated serial multiple mediation model revealed that rigid control had an indirect effect on BMI through food cravings and perceived self-regulatory success, particularly when flexible control was low. These interactive effects could largely be replicated in a second study with female participants (n = 70).
Conclusions
The current findings replicate and extend previous reports in that high flexible control may “compensate” for high rigid control, that is, attenuate the effect of rigid control on eating behaviors and body weight. They also provide insights into the mediating mechanisms that link rigid and flexible control of eating behavior with BMI.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Cepeda-Benito, A., Gleaves, D. H., Williams, T. L., & Erath, S. A. (2000). The development and validation of the state and trait Food-Cravings Questionnaires. Behavior Therapy, 31, 151–173.
3.
Fishbach, A., Friedman, R. S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309.
4.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
5.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.
6.
Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (in press). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy.
7.
Meule, A., & Blechert, J. (2017). Indirect effects of trait impulsivity on body mass. Eating Behaviors, 26, 66–69.
8.
Meule, A., Lutz, A., Vögele, C., & Kübler, A. (2012). Food cravings discriminate differentially between successful and unsuccessful dieters and non-dieters. Validation of the Food Cravings Questionnaires in German. Appetite, 58, 88–97.
9.
Meule, A., Papies, E. K., & Kübler, A. (2012). Differentiating between successful and unsuccessful dieters: Validity and reliability of the Perceived Self-Regulatory Success in Dieting Scale. Appetite, 58, 822–826.
10.
Meule, A., Richard, A., & Platte, P. (2017). Food cravings prospectively predict decreases in perceived self-regulatory success in dieting. Eating Behaviors, 24, 34–38.
11.
Meule, A., Westenhöfer, J., & Kübler, A. (2011). Food cravings mediate the relationship between rigid, but not flexible control of eating behavior and dieting success. Appetite, 57, 582–584.
12.
Timko, C. A., Oelrich, C., & Lowe, M. R. (2007). Prospective relationship of rigid and flexible control and weight loss. Verhaltenstherapie, 17, 84–89.
13.
Timko, C. A., & Perone, J. (2005). Rigid and flexible control of eating behavior in a college population. Eating Behaviors, 6, 119–125.
14.
Tuschl, R. J. (1990). From dietary restraint to binge eating: some theoretical considerations. Appetite, 14, 105–109.
15.
Tylka, T. L., Calogero, R. M., & Daníelsdóttir, S. (2015). Is intuitive eating the same as flexible dietary control? Their links to each other and well-being could provide an answer. Appetite, 95, 166–175.
16.
Westenhoefer, J. (1991). Dietary restraint and disinhibition: Is restraint a homogeneous construct? Appetite, 16, 45–55.
17.
Westenhoefer, J., Broeckmann, P., Munch, A. K., & Pudel, V. (1994). Cognitive control of eating behaviour and the disinhibition effect. Appetite, 23, 27–41.
18.
Westenhoefer, J., Stunkard, A. J., & Pudel, V. (1999). Validation of the flexible and rigid control dimensions of dietary restraint. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 53–64.
19.
Zyriax, B. C., Wolf, C., Schlüter, A., Khattak, A. H., Westenhoefer, J., & Windler, E. (2012). Association of cognitive dietary restraint and disinhibition with prediabetes-cross-sectional and longitudinal data of a feasibility study in German employees. Public Health Nutrition, 15, 860–867.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.