ORIGINAL PAPER
Development and validation of a stress response measure: the Daily Stress Response Scale (DSRS)
| 1 | Faculty of Psychology and Law, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan, Poland |
| 2 | Department of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom |
| 3 | Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department with the Center for Acute Poisoning, St. Jadwiga Provincial Clinical Hospital, Rzeszow, Poland |
| 4 | Medical College, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland |
| 5 | Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice, Poland |
| 6 | Department of Psychology, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom |
| 7 | Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Agata Debowska
Faculty of Psychology and Law, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan, Poland
Faculty of Psychology and Law, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan, Poland
Submission date: 2021-10-13
Final revision date: 2022-04-30
Acceptance date: 2022-05-05
Online publication date: 2022-06-14
Health Psychology Report 2022;10(3):238–248
KEYWORDS
Daily Stress Response Scale (DSRS)stress responseconfirmatory factor analysis (CFA)criterion-related validitycoefficient omega
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
To date, there is a lack of measures for capturing a broad spectrum of psychophysiological stress reactions that can be administered on a daily basis and in different contexts. A need for such a measure is especially salient in settings where stress processes can unfold momentarily and substantially fluctuate daily. Therefore, the main aim of the current study was to develop and validate the Daily Stress Response Scale (DSRS), an instrument capturing a broad spectrum of psycho-physiological stress reactions that can be administered in real time and in different contexts.
Participants and procedure:
The study was conducted in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Participants were 7228 (81% female) Polish university students. The data were collected anonymously through self-completion questionnaires. The DSRS was subject to confirmatory factor analyses (CFA).
Results:
The DSRS is a 30-item, easy-to-use stress response measure with excellent psychometric properties. Based on CFA results, the scale consists of two subscales, psychological and physiological stress response, which form associations with related external criteria.
Conclusions:
The DSRS is a reliable and valid measure of psychological and physiological stress reactions that can be used to assess the stress response to daily stressors, including those of an acute nature, such as a crisis, trauma, or surgery.
To date, there is a lack of measures for capturing a broad spectrum of psychophysiological stress reactions that can be administered on a daily basis and in different contexts. A need for such a measure is especially salient in settings where stress processes can unfold momentarily and substantially fluctuate daily. Therefore, the main aim of the current study was to develop and validate the Daily Stress Response Scale (DSRS), an instrument capturing a broad spectrum of psycho-physiological stress reactions that can be administered in real time and in different contexts.
Participants and procedure:
The study was conducted in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Participants were 7228 (81% female) Polish university students. The data were collected anonymously through self-completion questionnaires. The DSRS was subject to confirmatory factor analyses (CFA).
Results:
The DSRS is a 30-item, easy-to-use stress response measure with excellent psychometric properties. Based on CFA results, the scale consists of two subscales, psychological and physiological stress response, which form associations with related external criteria.
Conclusions:
The DSRS is a reliable and valid measure of psychological and physiological stress reactions that can be used to assess the stress response to daily stressors, including those of an acute nature, such as a crisis, trauma, or surgery.
REFERENCES (39)
1.
Arnett, J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford Uni-versity Press.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2....
3.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
4.
Caplan, R. D. (1983). Person-environment fit: Past, present, and future. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Stress research (pp. 35–78). Wiley.
5.
Cerejeira, J., Batista, P., Nogueira, V., Vaz-Serra, A., & Mukaetova-Ladinska, E. B. (2013). The stress response to surgery and postoperative delirium: evidence of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis hyperresponsiveness and decreased suppression of the GH/IGF-1 axis. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 26, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/089198....
6.
Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. (2007). Multiple pathways from stress to suicidality and the protective effect of social support in Hong Kong adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2....
7.
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. JAMA, 298, 1685–1687. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2....
8.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/213640....
9.
Desborough, J. P. (2000). The stress response to trauma and surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 85, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/85....
10.
Dobson, K. S. (1985). The relationship between anxiety and depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7....
11.
Dusselier, L., Dunn, B., Wang, Y., Shelley II, M. C., & Whalen, D. F. (2005). Personal, health, academic, and envi-ronmental predictors of stress for residence hall students. Journal of American College Health, 54, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.5....
12.
Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8....
13.
Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., & Mendes, W. B. (2018). More than a feeling: a unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 49, 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrn....
14.
Gray-Toft, P., & Anderson, J. G. (1981). The Nursing Stress Scale: Development of an instrument. Journal of Be-havioral Assessment, 3, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0132....
15.
Gagnon, S. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Acute stress and episodic memory retrieval: Neurobiological mechanisms and behavioral consequences. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.1....
16.
Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
17.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-0....
18.
Holman, E. A., Silver, R. C., Poulin, M., Andersen, J., Gil-Rivas, V., & McIntosh, D. N. (2008). Terrorism, acute stress, and cardiovascular health: a 3-year national study following the September 11th attacks. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archge....
19.
Jacobson, N. C., & Newman, M. G. (2017). Anxiety and depression as bidirectional risk factors for one another: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1155–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul000....
20.
Joiner Jr, T. E., Pfaff, J. J., & Acres, J. G. (2002). A brief screening tool for suicidal symptoms in adolescents and young adults in general health settings: Reliability and validity data from the Australian National General Prac-tice Youth Suicide Prevention Project. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-....
21.
Juczyński, Z., & Ogińska-Bulik, N. (2009). Skala Odczuwanego Stresu – PSS-10 [The Perceived Stress Scale – PSS-10]. In Z. Juczyński (Ed.), Narzędzia pomiaru stresu i radzenia sobie ze stresem [Measurement tools in promo-tion and health psychology (pp. 11–22). Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psycho-logicznego.
23.
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depres-sion Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7....
24.
Makara-Studzińska, M., Tyburski, E. M., Załuski, M., Adamczyk, K., Mesterhazy, J., & Mesterhazy, A. (2022). Con-firmatory factor analysis of three versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-42, DASS-21, and DASS-12) in Polish adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 770532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.....
25.
Meadows, S. O., Brown, J. S., & Elder, G. H. (2006). Depressive symptoms, stress, and support: Gendered trajecto-ries from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964....
27.
Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E. (1997). The hopelessness depression symptom questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021....
28.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
29.
Payne, R. (1999). Stress at work: a conceptual framework. In J. Firth-Cozens & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress in health professionals: Psychological and organisational causes and interventions (pp. 3–16). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
30.
Pezdek, K. (2003). Event memory and autobiographical memory for the events of September 11, 2001. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.98....
31.
Shalev, A. Y., Sahar, T., Freedman, S., Peri, T., Glick, N., Brandes, D., Orr, S. P., & Pitman, R. K. (1998). A prospective study of heart rate response following trauma and the subsequent development of posttraumat-ic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1001/archps....
32.
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
33.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
34.
Studencka Marka (n.d.). Studenci ze względu na płeć – ogółem i typy uczelni [Students by gender – general and types of university]. Retrieved from https://www.studenckamarka.pl/....
35.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0229....
36.
Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/174056....
37.
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
38.
Zirkel, S. (1992). Developing independence in a life transition: Investing the self in the concerns of the day. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
39.
Zirkel, S., & Cantor, N. (1990). Personal construal of life tasks: Those who struggle for independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.